From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41A99C3A59E for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 05:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5032173E for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 05:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727828AbfHZFrl (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 01:47:41 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:58730 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725446AbfHZFrl (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 01:47:41 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f80:35cd::d71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCC92152366BE; Sun, 25 Aug 2019 22:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 22:47:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20190825.224740.1795212985640138995.davem@davemloft.net> To: michael.chan@broadcom.com Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vasundhara-v.volam@broadcom.com, jiri@mellanox.com, ray.jui@broadcom.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 04/14] bnxt_en: Handle firmware reset status during IF_UP. From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1566791705-20473-5-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com> References: <1566791705-20473-1-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com> <1566791705-20473-5-git-send-email-michael.chan@broadcom.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Sun, 25 Aug 2019 22:47:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Michael Chan Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2019 23:54:55 -0400 > @@ -7005,7 +7005,9 @@ static int __bnxt_hwrm_ver_get(struct bnxt *bp, bool silent) > > rc = bnxt_hwrm_do_send_msg(bp, &req, sizeof(req), HWRM_CMD_TIMEOUT, > silent); > - return rc; > + if (rc) > + return -ENODEV; > + return 0; > } > > static int bnxt_hwrm_ver_get(struct bnxt *bp) ... > @@ -8528,26 +8533,53 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_if_change(struct bnxt *bp, bool up) > req.flags = cpu_to_le32(FUNC_DRV_IF_CHANGE_REQ_FLAGS_UP); > mutex_lock(&bp->hwrm_cmd_lock); > rc = _hwrm_send_message(bp, &req, sizeof(req), HWRM_CMD_TIMEOUT); > - if (!rc && (resp->flags & > - cpu_to_le32(FUNC_DRV_IF_CHANGE_RESP_FLAGS_RESC_CHANGE))) > - resc_reinit = true; > + if (!rc) > + flags = le32_to_cpu(resp->flags); > mutex_unlock(&bp->hwrm_cmd_lock); > + if (rc) > + return -EIO; Following up to my other review comments, if _hwrm_send_message() et al. returned consistently proper error codes instead of sometimes -1, couldn't you avoid at least some of these 'rc' remappings?