* [PATCH net v3] ixgbe: fix double clean of tx descriptors with xdp [not found] <CGME20190822171243eucas1p12213f2239d6c36be515dade41ed7470b@eucas1p1.samsung.com> @ 2019-08-22 17:12 ` Ilya Maximets 2019-08-22 17:21 ` Alexander Duyck ` (2 more replies) 0 siblings, 3 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ilya Maximets @ 2019-08-22 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw) To: netdev Cc: linux-kernel, bpf, David S. Miller, Björn Töpel, Magnus Karlsson, Jakub Kicinski, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Jeff Kirsher, intel-wired-lan, Eelco Chaudron, William Tu, Alexander Duyck, Ilya Maximets Tx code doesn't clear the descriptors' status after cleaning. So, if the budget is larger than number of used elems in a ring, some descriptors will be accounted twice and xsk_umem_complete_tx will move prod_tail far beyond the prod_head breaking the completion queue ring. Fix that by limiting the number of descriptors to clean by the number of used descriptors in the tx ring. 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' function refactored to look more like 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()' since we're allowed to directly use 'next_to_clean' and 'next_to_use' indexes. Fixes: 8221c5eba8c1 ("ixgbe: add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support") Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com> --- Version 3: * Reverted some refactoring made for v2. * Eliminated 'budget' for tx clean. * prefetch returned. Version 2: * 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' refactored to look more like 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()'. drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c | 29 ++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c index 6b609553329f..a3b6d8c89127 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c @@ -633,19 +633,17 @@ static void ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_buffer(struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring, bool ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector, struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring, int napi_budget) { + u16 ntc = tx_ring->next_to_clean, ntu = tx_ring->next_to_use; unsigned int total_packets = 0, total_bytes = 0; - u32 i = tx_ring->next_to_clean, xsk_frames = 0; - unsigned int budget = q_vector->tx.work_limit; struct xdp_umem *umem = tx_ring->xsk_umem; union ixgbe_adv_tx_desc *tx_desc; struct ixgbe_tx_buffer *tx_bi; - bool xmit_done; + u32 xsk_frames = 0; - tx_bi = &tx_ring->tx_buffer_info[i]; - tx_desc = IXGBE_TX_DESC(tx_ring, i); - i -= tx_ring->count; + tx_bi = &tx_ring->tx_buffer_info[ntc]; + tx_desc = IXGBE_TX_DESC(tx_ring, ntc); - do { + while (ntc != ntu) { if (!(tx_desc->wb.status & cpu_to_le32(IXGBE_TXD_STAT_DD))) break; @@ -661,22 +659,18 @@ bool ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector, tx_bi++; tx_desc++; - i++; - if (unlikely(!i)) { - i -= tx_ring->count; + ntc++; + if (unlikely(ntc == tx_ring->count)) { + ntc = 0; tx_bi = tx_ring->tx_buffer_info; tx_desc = IXGBE_TX_DESC(tx_ring, 0); } /* issue prefetch for next Tx descriptor */ prefetch(tx_desc); + } - /* update budget accounting */ - budget--; - } while (likely(budget)); - - i += tx_ring->count; - tx_ring->next_to_clean = i; + tx_ring->next_to_clean = ntc; u64_stats_update_begin(&tx_ring->syncp); tx_ring->stats.bytes += total_bytes; @@ -688,8 +682,7 @@ bool ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector, if (xsk_frames) xsk_umem_complete_tx(umem, xsk_frames); - xmit_done = ixgbe_xmit_zc(tx_ring, q_vector->tx.work_limit); - return budget > 0 && xmit_done; + return ixgbe_xmit_zc(tx_ring, q_vector->tx.work_limit); } int ixgbe_xsk_async_xmit(struct net_device *dev, u32 qid) -- 2.17.1 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] ixgbe: fix double clean of tx descriptors with xdp 2019-08-22 17:12 ` [PATCH net v3] ixgbe: fix double clean of tx descriptors with xdp Ilya Maximets @ 2019-08-22 17:21 ` Alexander Duyck 2019-08-22 17:32 ` William Tu 2019-08-23 12:10 ` Eelco Chaudron 2019-08-26 13:40 ` Maciej Fijalkowski 2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Alexander Duyck @ 2019-08-22 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ilya Maximets Cc: Netdev, LKML, bpf, David S. Miller, Björn Töpel, Magnus Karlsson, Jakub Kicinski, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Jeff Kirsher, intel-wired-lan, Eelco Chaudron, William Tu On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:12 AM Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com> wrote: > > Tx code doesn't clear the descriptors' status after cleaning. > So, if the budget is larger than number of used elems in a ring, some > descriptors will be accounted twice and xsk_umem_complete_tx will move > prod_tail far beyond the prod_head breaking the completion queue ring. > > Fix that by limiting the number of descriptors to clean by the number > of used descriptors in the tx ring. > > 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' function refactored to look more like > 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()' since we're allowed to directly use > 'next_to_clean' and 'next_to_use' indexes. > > Fixes: 8221c5eba8c1 ("ixgbe: add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support") > Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com> > --- > > Version 3: > * Reverted some refactoring made for v2. > * Eliminated 'budget' for tx clean. > * prefetch returned. > > Version 2: > * 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' refactored to look more like > 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()'. > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c | 29 ++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) Thanks for addressing my concerns. Acked-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] ixgbe: fix double clean of tx descriptors with xdp 2019-08-22 17:21 ` Alexander Duyck @ 2019-08-22 17:32 ` William Tu 2019-08-23 6:10 ` Björn Töpel 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: William Tu @ 2019-08-22 17:32 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexander Duyck Cc: Ilya Maximets, Netdev, LKML, bpf, David S. Miller, Björn Töpel, Magnus Karlsson, Jakub Kicinski, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Jeff Kirsher, intel-wired-lan, Eelco Chaudron On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:21 AM Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:12 AM Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com> wrote: > > > > Tx code doesn't clear the descriptors' status after cleaning. > > So, if the budget is larger than number of used elems in a ring, some > > descriptors will be accounted twice and xsk_umem_complete_tx will move > > prod_tail far beyond the prod_head breaking the completion queue ring. > > > > Fix that by limiting the number of descriptors to clean by the number > > of used descriptors in the tx ring. > > > > 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' function refactored to look more like > > 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()' since we're allowed to directly use > > 'next_to_clean' and 'next_to_use' indexes. > > > > Fixes: 8221c5eba8c1 ("ixgbe: add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support") > > Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com> > > --- > > > > Version 3: > > * Reverted some refactoring made for v2. > > * Eliminated 'budget' for tx clean. > > * prefetch returned. > > > > Version 2: > > * 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' refactored to look more like > > 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()'. > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c | 29 ++++++++------------ > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > Thanks for addressing my concerns. > > Acked-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> Thanks. Tested-by: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] ixgbe: fix double clean of tx descriptors with xdp 2019-08-22 17:32 ` William Tu @ 2019-08-23 6:10 ` Björn Töpel 2019-08-23 13:19 ` William Tu 0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Björn Töpel @ 2019-08-23 6:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: William Tu, Alexander Duyck Cc: Ilya Maximets, Netdev, LKML, bpf, David S. Miller, Magnus Karlsson, Jakub Kicinski, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Jeff Kirsher, intel-wired-lan, Eelco Chaudron On 2019-08-22 19:32, William Tu wrote: > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:21 AM Alexander Duyck > <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:12 AM Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com> wrote: >>> >>> Tx code doesn't clear the descriptors' status after cleaning. >>> So, if the budget is larger than number of used elems in a ring, some >>> descriptors will be accounted twice and xsk_umem_complete_tx will move >>> prod_tail far beyond the prod_head breaking the completion queue ring. >>> >>> Fix that by limiting the number of descriptors to clean by the number >>> of used descriptors in the tx ring. >>> >>> 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' function refactored to look more like >>> 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()' since we're allowed to directly use >>> 'next_to_clean' and 'next_to_use' indexes. >>> >>> Fixes: 8221c5eba8c1 ("ixgbe: add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support") >>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com> >>> --- >>> >>> Version 3: >>> * Reverted some refactoring made for v2. >>> * Eliminated 'budget' for tx clean. >>> * prefetch returned. >>> >>> Version 2: >>> * 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' refactored to look more like >>> 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()'. >>> >>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c | 29 ++++++++------------ >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> Thanks for addressing my concerns. >> >> Acked-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> > > Thanks. > > Tested-by: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com> > Will, thanks for testing! For this patch, did you notice any performance degradation? Cheers, Björn ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] ixgbe: fix double clean of tx descriptors with xdp 2019-08-23 6:10 ` Björn Töpel @ 2019-08-23 13:19 ` William Tu 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: William Tu @ 2019-08-23 13:19 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Björn Töpel Cc: Alexander Duyck, Ilya Maximets, Netdev, LKML, bpf, David S. Miller, Magnus Karlsson, Jakub Kicinski, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Jeff Kirsher, intel-wired-lan, Eelco Chaudron On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 11:10 PM Björn Töpel <bjorn.topel@intel.com> wrote: > > On 2019-08-22 19:32, William Tu wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:21 AM Alexander Duyck > > <alexander.duyck@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 10:12 AM Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> Tx code doesn't clear the descriptors' status after cleaning. > >>> So, if the budget is larger than number of used elems in a ring, some > >>> descriptors will be accounted twice and xsk_umem_complete_tx will move > >>> prod_tail far beyond the prod_head breaking the completion queue ring. > >>> > >>> Fix that by limiting the number of descriptors to clean by the number > >>> of used descriptors in the tx ring. > >>> > >>> 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' function refactored to look more like > >>> 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()' since we're allowed to directly use > >>> 'next_to_clean' and 'next_to_use' indexes. > >>> > >>> Fixes: 8221c5eba8c1 ("ixgbe: add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support") > >>> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com> > >>> --- > >>> > >>> Version 3: > >>> * Reverted some refactoring made for v2. > >>> * Eliminated 'budget' for tx clean. > >>> * prefetch returned. > >>> > >>> Version 2: > >>> * 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' refactored to look more like > >>> 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()'. > >>> > >>> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c | 29 ++++++++------------ > >>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > >> > >> Thanks for addressing my concerns. > >> > >> Acked-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@linux.intel.com> > > > > Thanks. > > > > Tested-by: William Tu <u9012063@gmail.com> > > > > Will, thanks for testing! For this patch, did you notice any performance > degradation? > No noticeable performance degradation seen this time. Thanks, William ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] ixgbe: fix double clean of tx descriptors with xdp 2019-08-22 17:12 ` [PATCH net v3] ixgbe: fix double clean of tx descriptors with xdp Ilya Maximets 2019-08-22 17:21 ` Alexander Duyck @ 2019-08-23 12:10 ` Eelco Chaudron 2019-08-26 13:40 ` Maciej Fijalkowski 2 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Eelco Chaudron @ 2019-08-23 12:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ilya Maximets Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, bpf, David S. Miller, Björn Töpel, Magnus Karlsson, Jakub Kicinski, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Jeff Kirsher, intel-wired-lan, William Tu, Alexander Duyck On 22 Aug 2019, at 19:12, Ilya Maximets wrote: > Tx code doesn't clear the descriptors' status after cleaning. > So, if the budget is larger than number of used elems in a ring, some > descriptors will be accounted twice and xsk_umem_complete_tx will move > prod_tail far beyond the prod_head breaking the completion queue ring. > > Fix that by limiting the number of descriptors to clean by the number > of used descriptors in the tx ring. > > 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' function refactored to look more like > 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()' since we're allowed to directly use > 'next_to_clean' and 'next_to_use' indexes. > > Fixes: 8221c5eba8c1 ("ixgbe: add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support") > Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com> > --- > > Version 3: > * Reverted some refactoring made for v2. > * Eliminated 'budget' for tx clean. > * prefetch returned. > > Version 2: > * 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' refactored to look more like > 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()'. > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c | 29 > ++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > Did some test with and without the fix applied. For PVP the results are a little different depending on the packet size (note this is a single run, no deviation). For the same physical port in and out it’s faster! Note this was OVS AF_XDP using a XENA tester at 10G wire speed. +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Physical to Virtual to Physical test, L3 flows[port redirect] | +-----------------+--------------------------------------------------------------+ | | Packet size | +-----------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ | Number of flows | 64 | 128 | 256 | 512 | 768 | 1024 | 1514 | +-----------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ | [NO FIX] 1000 | 739161 | 700091 | 690034 | 659894 | 618128 | 594223 | 537504 | +-----------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ | [FIX] 1000 | 742317 | 708391 | 689952 | 658034 | 626056 | 587653 | 530885 | +-----------------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+ +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Physical loopback test, L3 flows[port redirect] | +-----------------+--------------------------------------------------------------------+ | | Packet size | +-----------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------+ | Number of flows | 64 | 128 | 256 | 512 | 768 | 1024 | 1514 | +-----------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------+ | [NO FIX] 1000 | 2573298 | 2227578 | 2514318 | 2298204 | 1081861 | 1015173 | 788081 | +-----------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------+ | [FIX] 1000 | 3343188 | 3234993 | 3151833 | 2349597 | 1586276 | 1197304 | 814854 | +-----------------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------+ Tested-by: Eelco Chaudron <echaudro@redhat.com> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] ixgbe: fix double clean of tx descriptors with xdp 2019-08-22 17:12 ` [PATCH net v3] ixgbe: fix double clean of tx descriptors with xdp Ilya Maximets 2019-08-22 17:21 ` Alexander Duyck 2019-08-23 12:10 ` Eelco Chaudron @ 2019-08-26 13:40 ` Maciej Fijalkowski 2019-08-27 11:00 ` Ilya Maximets 2 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread From: Maciej Fijalkowski @ 2019-08-26 13:40 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Ilya Maximets Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, bpf, David S. Miller, Björn Töpel, Magnus Karlsson, Jakub Kicinski, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Jeff Kirsher, intel-wired-lan, Eelco Chaudron, William Tu, Alexander Duyck On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 20:12:37 +0300 Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com> wrote: > Tx code doesn't clear the descriptors' status after cleaning. > So, if the budget is larger than number of used elems in a ring, some > descriptors will be accounted twice and xsk_umem_complete_tx will move > prod_tail far beyond the prod_head breaking the completion queue ring. > > Fix that by limiting the number of descriptors to clean by the number > of used descriptors in the tx ring. > > 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' function refactored to look more like > 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()' since we're allowed to directly use > 'next_to_clean' and 'next_to_use' indexes. > > Fixes: 8221c5eba8c1 ("ixgbe: add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support") > Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com> > --- > > Version 3: > * Reverted some refactoring made for v2. > * Eliminated 'budget' for tx clean. > * prefetch returned. > > Version 2: > * 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' refactored to look more like > 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()'. > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c | 29 ++++++++------------ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c > index 6b609553329f..a3b6d8c89127 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c > @@ -633,19 +633,17 @@ static void ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_buffer(struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring, > bool ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector, > struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring, int napi_budget) While you're at it, can you please as well remove the 'napi_budget' argument? It wasn't used at all even before your patch. I'm jumping late in, but I was really wondering and hesitated with taking part in discussion since the v1 of this patch - can you elaborate why simply clearing the DD bit wasn't sufficient? Maciej > { > + u16 ntc = tx_ring->next_to_clean, ntu = tx_ring->next_to_use; > unsigned int total_packets = 0, total_bytes = 0; > - u32 i = tx_ring->next_to_clean, xsk_frames = 0; > - unsigned int budget = q_vector->tx.work_limit; > struct xdp_umem *umem = tx_ring->xsk_umem; > union ixgbe_adv_tx_desc *tx_desc; > struct ixgbe_tx_buffer *tx_bi; > - bool xmit_done; > + u32 xsk_frames = 0; > > - tx_bi = &tx_ring->tx_buffer_info[i]; > - tx_desc = IXGBE_TX_DESC(tx_ring, i); > - i -= tx_ring->count; > + tx_bi = &tx_ring->tx_buffer_info[ntc]; > + tx_desc = IXGBE_TX_DESC(tx_ring, ntc); > > - do { > + while (ntc != ntu) { > if (!(tx_desc->wb.status & cpu_to_le32(IXGBE_TXD_STAT_DD))) > break; > > @@ -661,22 +659,18 @@ bool ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector, > > tx_bi++; > tx_desc++; > - i++; > - if (unlikely(!i)) { > - i -= tx_ring->count; > + ntc++; > + if (unlikely(ntc == tx_ring->count)) { > + ntc = 0; > tx_bi = tx_ring->tx_buffer_info; > tx_desc = IXGBE_TX_DESC(tx_ring, 0); > } > > /* issue prefetch for next Tx descriptor */ > prefetch(tx_desc); > + } > > - /* update budget accounting */ > - budget--; > - } while (likely(budget)); > - > - i += tx_ring->count; > - tx_ring->next_to_clean = i; > + tx_ring->next_to_clean = ntc; > > u64_stats_update_begin(&tx_ring->syncp); > tx_ring->stats.bytes += total_bytes; > @@ -688,8 +682,7 @@ bool ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector, > if (xsk_frames) > xsk_umem_complete_tx(umem, xsk_frames); > > - xmit_done = ixgbe_xmit_zc(tx_ring, q_vector->tx.work_limit); > - return budget > 0 && xmit_done; > + return ixgbe_xmit_zc(tx_ring, q_vector->tx.work_limit); > } > > int ixgbe_xsk_async_xmit(struct net_device *dev, u32 qid) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH net v3] ixgbe: fix double clean of tx descriptors with xdp 2019-08-26 13:40 ` Maciej Fijalkowski @ 2019-08-27 11:00 ` Ilya Maximets 0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: Ilya Maximets @ 2019-08-27 11:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Maciej Fijalkowski Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, bpf, David S. Miller, Björn Töpel, Magnus Karlsson, Jakub Kicinski, Alexei Starovoitov, Daniel Borkmann, Jeff Kirsher, intel-wired-lan, Eelco Chaudron, William Tu, Alexander Duyck On 26.08.2019 16:40, Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > On Thu, 22 Aug 2019 20:12:37 +0300 > Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com> wrote: > >> Tx code doesn't clear the descriptors' status after cleaning. >> So, if the budget is larger than number of used elems in a ring, some >> descriptors will be accounted twice and xsk_umem_complete_tx will move >> prod_tail far beyond the prod_head breaking the completion queue ring. >> >> Fix that by limiting the number of descriptors to clean by the number >> of used descriptors in the tx ring. >> >> 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' function refactored to look more like >> 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()' since we're allowed to directly use >> 'next_to_clean' and 'next_to_use' indexes. >> >> Fixes: 8221c5eba8c1 ("ixgbe: add AF_XDP zero-copy Tx support") >> Signed-off-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com> >> --- >> >> Version 3: >> * Reverted some refactoring made for v2. >> * Eliminated 'budget' for tx clean. >> * prefetch returned. >> >> Version 2: >> * 'ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq()' refactored to look more like >> 'ixgbe_xsk_clean_tx_ring()'. >> >> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c | 29 ++++++++------------ >> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c >> index 6b609553329f..a3b6d8c89127 100644 >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_xsk.c >> @@ -633,19 +633,17 @@ static void ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_buffer(struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring, >> bool ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector, >> struct ixgbe_ring *tx_ring, int napi_budget) > > While you're at it, can you please as well remove the 'napi_budget' argument? > It wasn't used at all even before your patch. As you mentioned, this is not related to current patch and this patch doesn't touch these particular lines of code. So, I think it's better to make a separate patch for this if you think it's needed. > > I'm jumping late in, but I was really wondering and hesitated with taking > part in discussion since the v1 of this patch - can you elaborate why simply > clearing the DD bit wasn't sufficient? Clearing the DD bit will end up driver and hardware writing to close memory locations at the same time leading to cache trashing and poor performance. Anyway additional write is unnecessary, because we know exactly which descriptors we need to check. Best regards, Ilya Maximets. > > Maciej > >> { >> + u16 ntc = tx_ring->next_to_clean, ntu = tx_ring->next_to_use; >> unsigned int total_packets = 0, total_bytes = 0; >> - u32 i = tx_ring->next_to_clean, xsk_frames = 0; >> - unsigned int budget = q_vector->tx.work_limit; >> struct xdp_umem *umem = tx_ring->xsk_umem; >> union ixgbe_adv_tx_desc *tx_desc; >> struct ixgbe_tx_buffer *tx_bi; >> - bool xmit_done; >> + u32 xsk_frames = 0; >> >> - tx_bi = &tx_ring->tx_buffer_info[i]; >> - tx_desc = IXGBE_TX_DESC(tx_ring, i); >> - i -= tx_ring->count; >> + tx_bi = &tx_ring->tx_buffer_info[ntc]; >> + tx_desc = IXGBE_TX_DESC(tx_ring, ntc); >> >> - do { >> + while (ntc != ntu) { >> if (!(tx_desc->wb.status & cpu_to_le32(IXGBE_TXD_STAT_DD))) >> break; >> >> @@ -661,22 +659,18 @@ bool ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector, >> >> tx_bi++; >> tx_desc++; >> - i++; >> - if (unlikely(!i)) { >> - i -= tx_ring->count; >> + ntc++; >> + if (unlikely(ntc == tx_ring->count)) { >> + ntc = 0; >> tx_bi = tx_ring->tx_buffer_info; >> tx_desc = IXGBE_TX_DESC(tx_ring, 0); >> } >> >> /* issue prefetch for next Tx descriptor */ >> prefetch(tx_desc); >> + } >> >> - /* update budget accounting */ >> - budget--; >> - } while (likely(budget)); >> - >> - i += tx_ring->count; >> - tx_ring->next_to_clean = i; >> + tx_ring->next_to_clean = ntc; >> >> u64_stats_update_begin(&tx_ring->syncp); >> tx_ring->stats.bytes += total_bytes; >> @@ -688,8 +682,7 @@ bool ixgbe_clean_xdp_tx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector, >> if (xsk_frames) >> xsk_umem_complete_tx(umem, xsk_frames); >> >> - xmit_done = ixgbe_xmit_zc(tx_ring, q_vector->tx.work_limit); >> - return budget > 0 && xmit_done; >> + return ixgbe_xmit_zc(tx_ring, q_vector->tx.work_limit); >> } >> >> int ixgbe_xsk_async_xmit(struct net_device *dev, u32 qid) > > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2019-08-27 11:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <CGME20190822171243eucas1p12213f2239d6c36be515dade41ed7470b@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2019-08-22 17:12 ` [PATCH net v3] ixgbe: fix double clean of tx descriptors with xdp Ilya Maximets
2019-08-22 17:21 ` Alexander Duyck
2019-08-22 17:32 ` William Tu
2019-08-23 6:10 ` Björn Töpel
2019-08-23 13:19 ` William Tu
2019-08-23 12:10 ` Eelco Chaudron
2019-08-26 13:40 ` Maciej Fijalkowski
2019-08-27 11:00 ` Ilya Maximets
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).