From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20A2C3A5A1 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 07:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA84220828 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 07:12:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726290AbfH1HMk (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 03:12:40 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:40932 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726247AbfH1HMk (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 03:12:40 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BB218AC6E1; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 07:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krava (unknown [10.43.17.33]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DF9885D6A7; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 07:12:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 09:12:37 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Julia Kartseva Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , "labbott@redhat.com" , "acme@kernel.org" , "debian-kernel@lists.debian.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Andrey Ignatov , Yonghong Song , "jolsa@kernel.org" , Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: libbpf distro packaging Message-ID: <20190828071237.GA31023@krava> References: <3FBEC3F8-5C3C-40F9-AF6E-C355D8F62722@fb.com> <20190813122420.GB9349@krava> <20190821210906.GA31031@krava> <20190823092253.GA20775@krava> <20190826064235.GA17554@krava> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.15 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.69]); Wed, 28 Aug 2019 07:12:40 +0000 (UTC) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 10:30:24PM +0000, Julia Kartseva wrote: > On 8/25/19, 11:42 PM, "Jiri Olsa" wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 04:00:01PM +0000, Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > > > > > Technically we can bump it at any time. > > > The goal was to bump it only when new kernel is released > > > to capture a collection of new APIs in a given 0.0.X release. > > > So that libbpf versions are synchronized with kernel versions > > > in some what loose way. > > > In this case we can make an exception and bump it now. > > > > I see, I dont think it's worth of the exception now, > > the patch is simple or we'll start with 0.0.3 > > PR introducing 0.0.5 ABI was merged: > https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/commit/476e158 > Jiri, you'd like to avoid patching, you can start w/ 0.0.5. > Also if you're planning to use *.spec from libbpf as a source of truth, > It may be enhanced by syncing spec and ABI versions, similar to > https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/commit/d60f568 cool, anyway I started with v0.0.3 ;-) I'll update to latest once we are merged in the spec/srpm is currently under Fedora review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745478 you can check it in here: http://people.redhat.com/~jolsa/libbpf/v2/ I think it's little different from what you have, but not in the essential parts jirka