From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=HsJH=XG=vger.kernel.org=netdev-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,
	MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2D9ECDE27
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:25:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E2932089F
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 09:25:22 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727365AbfIKJZT (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 11 Sep 2019 05:25:19 -0400
Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:3742 "EHLO mga09.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726579AbfIKJZT (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 11 Sep 2019 05:25:19 -0400
X-Amp-Result: UNSCANNABLE
X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
  by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 11 Sep 2019 02:25:18 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,492,1559545200"; 
   d="scan'208";a="214619764"
Received: from smile.fi.intel.com (HELO smile) ([10.237.68.40])
  by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Sep 2019 02:25:16 -0700
Received: from andy by smile with local (Exim 4.92.1)
        (envelope-from <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>)
        id 1i7ysE-0005Lw-SK; Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:25:14 +0300
Date:   Wed, 11 Sep 2019 12:25:14 +0300
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To:     Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc:     Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
        Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] net: phylink: switch to using
 fwnode_gpiod_get_index()
Message-ID: <20190911092514.GM2680@smile.fi.intel.com>
References: <20190911075215.78047-1-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
 <20190911075215.78047-5-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190911075215.78047-5-dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:52:08AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use
> the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), bit
> works with arbitrary firmware node.

I'm wondering if it's possible to step forward and replace
fwnode_get_gpiod_index by gpiod_get() / gpiod_get_index() here and
in other cases in this series.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko