From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207A5C49ED6 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EC12084F for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 06:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=resnulli-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@resnulli-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="rV/YuXTG" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726442AbfINGAQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 02:00:16 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f68.google.com ([209.85.128.68]:38764 "EHLO mail-wm1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726416AbfINGAQ (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 02:00:16 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f68.google.com with SMTP id o184so4782700wme.3 for ; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 23:00:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=B5RyNiDOxDsdkwnbKYcqgnkEDpXQGDzSW0CX26WZeWQ=; b=rV/YuXTG1S52o6Wz061TjpLeHZFiXtbXZ5mkn5XW9c+VMXr1BO1lNzW7xptxoaLMku OsYVxcGZgEMV0IqmXvs7Bn+6ufWX/BeaBkuZTio5n6lnVZJWzHthBwB351qcmVaWdfPm D4Yg/1CBO2Unwyk2EMYbEq8sLtTRUfyeWONUsgQe3o7ZOD70X3yCNHvEV7sKidyYo0oN hZeMpmQqwAExULsd9V/K9PPJ73RJwDMFVmGZw18T59TJ8NJBJaxp1QUQ5u7gUWelgLFs /mfxRZROJ5u2kmd8JZfikiez2Bqg2X0VgzeQBkptsX9ZRijXJHY38xKL6wa5U93YqZ6F NSVw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=B5RyNiDOxDsdkwnbKYcqgnkEDpXQGDzSW0CX26WZeWQ=; b=pnJQHppfp0SDjqUoRthbO+nJyvP/aEmgG/Pvu8KkZ7CR1S5UjBXuJLdP/tpu/Ch/+p r5JkTh1hmKmwirZ8dBU4Xr3FP8lhF0Wz5Ev0cvCoRrVWJi+kSurYnmF2SLTEaFQPoc9F X3rydzEeDHrY/3SxCqa4uPdAGAGssjremXAapiSmAfoXYojobRqwW/a0/NKRln2Y11sU xPXFy3rNjV7T0YNpmrJNy14MAAqJze/opV4fZaWZsRXMzCEHGLGMXktJX7Y9aZi81pIQ vj5eE7917lqkDHJK67kvGibCXe8OxO3IWkvAjHygBDUqvlzppyP0aUbK9uS529v77y6P A1YA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXAKv7IzHl8Kovd58PkaCD4Bkkwhk+oZlz4AK+JaHjZ+cvvgq+V 6SZ3XYuZYmqgQfB2SpuyyC2OrA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxgwEyv4EZkmUS+D2Ymj0OBXnNCXUP6odRcoHkyleai/Cc6FL1H1/qeMIq5f+pcydmTc6/iSw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:cc10:: with SMTP id h16mr6211618wmb.130.1568440814326; Fri, 13 Sep 2019 23:00:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (jirka.pirko.cz. [84.16.102.26]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i26sm3793801wmd.37.2019.09.13.23.00.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 13 Sep 2019 23:00:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 08:00:12 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko To: David Ahern Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, stephen@networkplumber.org, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, saeedm@mellanox.com, mlxsw@mellanox.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com Subject: Re: [patch iproute2-next v4 0/2] devlink: couple forgotten flash patches Message-ID: <20190914060012.GC2276@nanopsycho.orion> References: <20190912112938.2292-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <2c201359-2fa4-b1e4-061b-64a53eb30920@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2c201359-2fa4-b1e4-061b-64a53eb30920@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.11.4 (2019-03-13) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Fri, Sep 13, 2019 at 07:25:07PM CEST, dsahern@gmail.com wrote: >On 9/12/19 12:29 PM, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> From: Jiri Pirko >> >> I was under impression they are already merged, but apparently they are >> not. I just rebased them on top of current iproute2 net-next tree. >> > >they were not forgotten; they were dropped asking for changes. > >thread is here: >https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20190604134450.2839-3-jiri@resnulli.us/ Well not really. The path was discussed in the thread. However, that is unrelated to the changes these patches do. The flashing itself is already there and present. These patches only add status. Did I missed something?