From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C801AC10F14 for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A820F218DE for ; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:10:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729788AbfJCLKd (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2019 07:10:33 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44760 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729758AbfJCLKd (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Oct 2019 07:10:33 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BCF02302C086; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krava (unknown [10.43.17.55]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E1F85D9DC; Thu, 3 Oct 2019 11:10:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2019 13:10:29 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Julia Kartseva Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , "labbott@redhat.com" , "acme@kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Andrey Ignatov , Yonghong Song , "jolsa@kernel.org" , Daniel Borkmann , "md@linux.it" , "debian-kernel@lists.debian.org" Subject: Re: libbpf distro packaging Message-ID: <20191003111029.GC23291@krava> References: <20190821210906.GA31031@krava> <20190823092253.GA20775@krava> <20190826064235.GA17554@krava> <20190828071237.GA31023@krava> <20190930111305.GE602@krava> <8B38D651-7F77-485F-A054-0519AF3A9243@fb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <8B38D651-7F77-485F-A054-0519AF3A9243@fb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.46]); Thu, 03 Oct 2019 11:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 03, 2019 at 12:50:08AM +0000, Julia Kartseva wrote: > Hi Jiri, > > v0.0.5 is out: [1] which brings questions regarding further maintenance > of rpm. > Who'll maintain the most recent version of rpm up-to-date? I will do that on fedora/rhel side now > Are you looking into making the procedure automated and do you need any > help from the side of libbpf devs if so? In particular, we can have the *.spec file > in GH mirror synchronized with the most recent tag so you can take it from the > mirror along with tarball. some notification of new tag/sync would be great the spec file update is not a big deal because I need to do its changelog update anyway.. but I can put the fedora rpm spec in GH repo for reference, I will do a pull request for that jirka > Thanks! > > [1] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/releases/tag/v0.0.5 > > On 9/30/19, 11:18 AM, "Julia Kartseva" wrote: > > > Thank you Jiri, that's great news. > > > > > On 9/30/19, 4:13 AM, "Jiri Olsa" wrote: > > > > > > heya, > > > FYI we got it through.. there's libbpf-0.0.3 available on fedora 30/31/32 > > > I'll update to 0.0.5 version as soon as there's the v0.0.5 tag available > > >