From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DBA7ECE58E for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 15:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F132053B for ; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 15:15:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731593AbfJIPPI (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:15:08 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46812 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727920AbfJIPPI (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2019 11:15:08 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C35D3084032; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 15:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-116-110.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.116.110]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 649F960167; Wed, 9 Oct 2019 15:15:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2019 16:15:03 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi To: Stefano Garzarella Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kvm , Dexuan Cui , virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, "David S. Miller" , Jorgen Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/11] VSOCK: add AF_VSOCK test cases Message-ID: <20191009151503.GA13568@stefanha-x1.localdomain> References: <20190801152541.245833-1-sgarzare@redhat.com> <20190801152541.245833-8-sgarzare@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.40]); Wed, 09 Oct 2019 15:15:08 +0000 (UTC) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 12:03:53PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote: > Hi Stefan, > I'm thinking about dividing this test into single applications, one > for each test, do you think it makes sense? > Or is it just a useless complication? I don't mind either way but personally I would leave it as a single program. Stefan --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEEhpWov9P5fNqsNXdanKSrs4Grc8gFAl2d+XcACgkQnKSrs4Gr c8iLyQf/Zhb+RZJm3omrM8JeMvDADeG1HsilYyQHLlWrpKPJHyQVtNqGNx9bJxd+ Eq68BTkMmICqtmYwilCPPVlrx8et8zehRq871XzI6O/sXIme49zDJ056dPX1R1Gb +HAyhD9QD3YqFicOy1eA7YAtT8/VsQdXMQTUVkwcv/Nzi37O0xyd7KVV0TJvBVka 0NwoQYWegJqj48HghPtJrhr6xjOjj2xbBgW2AI9SFwSYNW9asQeEgfWbYAZZU/Ri Q2/xQjZbaaEKRhiIw+WoWJ4eXSZXzAzqh4cnyHVvJnoyLnO0Ed7qEUf4tcwFS1Eu KaaYezbOhj4tIKbacDvJ5+HM6M2QYA== =fCBd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --x+6KMIRAuhnl3hBn--