From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5A7C4360C for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEBE20650 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:01:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2390397AbfJPKBt (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 06:01:49 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46358 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727167AbfJPKBt (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 06:01:49 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 100D510C092B; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krava (unknown [10.43.17.61]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85C919C70; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 12:01:45 +0200 From: Jiri Olsa To: Julia Kartseva Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , "labbott@redhat.com" , "acme@kernel.org" , "debian-kernel@lists.debian.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Andrey Ignatov , Yonghong Song , "jolsa@kernel.org" , Daniel Borkmann , "md@linux.it" Subject: Re: libbpf distro packaging Message-ID: <20191016100145.GA15580@krava> References: <20190821210906.GA31031@krava> <20190823092253.GA20775@krava> <20190826064235.GA17554@krava> <20190828071237.GA31023@krava> <20190930111305.GE602@krava> <040A8497-C388-4B65-9562-6DB95D72BE0F@fb.com> <20191008073958.GA10009@krava> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.66]); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 10:01:49 +0000 (UTC) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 09:14:19PM +0000, Julia Kartseva wrote: > Hi Jiri, > > systemd folks published libbpf CentOS 7 package in systemd corp repo: [1], > so guess that proves that deps from other repo are fine. yea, actualy got request for that: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762219 jirka > > Rebuild is fairly simple: [2] > > [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mrc0mmand/systemd-centos-ci/build/1053694/ > [2] https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/13744#issuecomment-541168076 > > On 10/8/19, 12:40 AM, "Jiri Olsa" wrote: > > > > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 12:25:51AM +0000, Julia Kartseva wrote: > > > > > > I wonder what are the steps to make libbpf available for CentOS {7|8} as well? > > > One (likely the quickest) way to do that is to publish it to Fedora's EPEL [1]. > > > > > > I have a little concern about dependencies, namely elfutils-libelf-devel and > > > elfutils-devel are sourced directly by CentOS repos, e.g. [2], not sure if > > > dependencies from another repo are fine. > > > > > > Thoughts? Thanks! > > > > I think that should be ok, I'll ask around and let you know > > > > jirka >