From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF29FA372A for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:51:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1192D21A49 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:51:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2394421AbfJPSvw (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:51:52 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45620 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731889AbfJPSvw (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:51:52 -0400 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D999089B000; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (ovpn-112-65.ams2.redhat.com [10.36.112.65]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6549212C53; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 20:51:38 +0200 From: Stefano Brivio To: David Miller Cc: walteste@inf.ethz.ch, bcodding@redhat.com, gsierohu@redhat.com, nforro@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv4: Return -ENETUNREACH if we can't create route but saddr is valid Message-ID: <20191016205138.0c5a0058@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20191016.142159.1388461310782297107.davem@davemloft.net> References: <7bcfeaac2f78657db35ccf0e624745de41162129.1570722417.git.sbrivio@redhat.com> <20191016.142159.1388461310782297107.davem@davemloft.net> Organization: Red Hat MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.2 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.67]); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:51:52 +0000 (UTC) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 16 Oct 2019 14:21:59 -0400 (EDT) David Miller wrote: > From: Stefano Brivio > Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:51:50 +0200 > > > I think this should be considered for -stable, < 5.2 > > Changes meant for -stable should not target net-next, but rather net. Oh, sorry for that. I thought this would be the best way for patches that are not strictly (or proven) fixes for net, but still make sense for stable. I generalised David Ahern's hint from a different case, I thought you agreed (<20190618.092512.1610110055396742434.davem@davemloft.net>). Resending for net now. -- Stefano