From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=swfL=YM=vger.kernel.org=netdev-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,
	SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
	version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34B53CA9EAC
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 23:46:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04DA52064B
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Sat, 19 Oct 2019 23:46:15 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="TcQyowAB"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1726191AbfJSXqO (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Sat, 19 Oct 2019 19:46:14 -0400
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:54150 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726148AbfJSXqN (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sat, 19 Oct 2019 19:46:13 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch;
        s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:
        Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
        Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
        :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
        List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
        bh=y/IIk71iGqijigb+f4kG5p+2zvpKfOGln9jP+Gs0yiY=; b=TcQyowABaOW5fybIp1Bc55Zz7m
        RTvouIc41epvcSsR36jzfsbRCKDVUUy3GZMJ1+PPaLGHN+i9enmRFL1I4idSGaz54Vvz5bLGlDwc5
        s9sBq7OwJBTlhGklqM1+BjYsiLnDZunRuAy2i/cy/7HzcuGgEYVhufLN4dNEZrh6Ym0k=;
Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.92.2)
        (envelope-from <andrew@lunn.ch>)
        id 1iLyA6-0007Jj-Di; Sun, 20 Oct 2019 01:29:30 +0200
Date:   Sun, 20 Oct 2019 01:29:30 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Russell King <rmk@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     netdev@vger.kernel.org, linville@tuxdriver.com,
        f.fainelli@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] ethtool: correctly interpret bitrate of 255
Message-ID: <20191019232930.GA28013@lunn.ch>
References: <E1iLYu1-0000sp-W5@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E1iLYu1-0000sp-W5@rmk-PC.armlinux.org.uk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 09:31:13PM +0100, Russell King wrote:
> From: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
> 
> A bitrate of 255 is special, it means the bitrate is encoded in
> byte 66 in units of 250MBaud.  Add support for parsing these bit
> rates.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>

    Andrew