netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@netronome.com>
To: Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@gmail.com>,
	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@gmail.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
	"David S . Miller " <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
	Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	Paul Blakey <paulb@mellanox.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] bonding: balance ICMP echoes in layer3+4 mode
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 12:01:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191023100132.GD8732@netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191021200948.23775-5-mcroce@redhat.com>

On Mon, Oct 21, 2019 at 10:09:48PM +0200, Matteo Croce wrote:
> The bonding uses the L4 ports to balance flows between slaves.
> As the ICMP protocol has no ports, those packets are sent all to the
> same device:
> 
>     # tcpdump -qltnni veth0 ip |sed 's/^/0: /' &
>     # tcpdump -qltnni veth1 ip |sed 's/^/1: /' &
>     # ping -qc1 192.168.0.2
>     1: IP 192.168.0.1 > 192.168.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 315, seq 1, length 64
>     1: IP 192.168.0.2 > 192.168.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 315, seq 1, length 64
>     # ping -qc1 192.168.0.2
>     1: IP 192.168.0.1 > 192.168.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 316, seq 1, length 64
>     1: IP 192.168.0.2 > 192.168.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 316, seq 1, length 64
>     # ping -qc1 192.168.0.2
>     1: IP 192.168.0.1 > 192.168.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 317, seq 1, length 64
>     1: IP 192.168.0.2 > 192.168.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 317, seq 1, length 64
> 
> But some ICMP packets have an Identifier field which is
> used to match packets within sessions, let's use this value in the hash
> function to balance these packets between bond slaves:
> 
>     # ping -qc1 192.168.0.2
>     0: IP 192.168.0.1 > 192.168.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 303, seq 1, length 64
>     0: IP 192.168.0.2 > 192.168.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 303, seq 1, length 64
>     # ping -qc1 192.168.0.2
>     1: IP 192.168.0.1 > 192.168.0.2: ICMP echo request, id 304, seq 1, length 64
>     1: IP 192.168.0.2 > 192.168.0.1: ICMP echo reply, id 304, seq 1, length 64
> 
> Signed-off-by: Matteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com>

I see where this patch is going but it is unclear to me what problem it is
solving. I would expect ICMP traffic to be low volume and thus able to be
handled by a single lower-device of a bond.

...

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-23 10:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-21 20:09 [PATCH net-next 0/4] ICMP flow improvements Matteo Croce
2019-10-21 20:09 ` [PATCH net-next 1/4] flow_dissector: add meaningful comments Matteo Croce
2019-10-23  9:57   ` Simon Horman
2019-10-21 20:09 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] flow_dissector: skip the ICMP dissector for non ICMP packets Matteo Croce
2019-10-23  9:57   ` Simon Horman
2019-10-21 20:09 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] flow_dissector: extract more ICMP information Matteo Croce
2019-10-23 10:00   ` Simon Horman
2019-10-23 10:53     ` Matteo Croce
2019-10-23 17:55       ` Simon Horman
2019-10-25  0:27         ` Matteo Croce
2019-10-25  6:28           ` Simon Horman
2019-10-25 18:24             ` Matteo Croce
2019-10-26  7:55               ` Simon Horman
2019-10-21 20:09 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] bonding: balance ICMP echoes in layer3+4 mode Matteo Croce
2019-10-23 10:01   ` Simon Horman [this message]
2019-10-23 16:58     ` Matteo Croce
2019-10-23 18:00       ` Simon Horman
2019-10-24 22:05 ` [PATCH net-next 0/4] ICMP flow improvements David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191023100132.GD8732@netronome.com \
    --to=simon.horman@netronome.com \
    --cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=j.vosburgh@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcroce@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulb@mellanox.com \
    --cc=sdf@google.com \
    --cc=songliubraving@fb.com \
    --cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).