From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63F45CA9EB9 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 02:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A35205ED for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 02:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="5KIB3Rtt" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2408293AbfJXCnA (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 22:43:00 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:60870 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2408288AbfJXCnA (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 22:43:00 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=zDYBgon5UhlK4awg+VCam1Uhngtd8ytTSRuFIonrn5E=; b=5KIB3Rttew+KXafCVK2Z2jst62 pymKOdH6PHuIV51YARJtwU/R3Q1bKOVj482rQAbasTEdx4+VGhepVPT76pk/K/IXpeEiUlvh96QCz eHAFDuPILcfjMBBXRdJn0HzuM2au+aQL1z6Pq54GuNSFpl3vMJ6wFPB4mjtBl2pZA/hc=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.92.2) (envelope-from ) id 1iNT5U-0001Gd-UM; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:42:56 +0200 Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:42:56 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: David Miller Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, vivien.didelot@gmail.com, jiri@mellanox.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] mv88e6xxx: Allow config of ATU hash algorithm Message-ID: <20191024024256.GL5707@lunn.ch> References: <20191022013436.29635-1-andrew@lunn.ch> <20191023.191830.347702095940587406.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191023.191830.347702095940587406.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 07:18:30PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > > Andrew, this only applies to 'net' but it feels more like a feature > to me. Hi David It was intended for net-next. Sorry. It could be that Viviens port list patches got in the middle so that these did not cleanly apply to net-next. > Please give me some guidance and use [PATCH net-next .. ] in the future. I wonder if we could get checkpatch to warn about this? Andrew