From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: of_get_phy_mode: Change API to solve int/unit warnings
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2019 04:49:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191024024935.GM5707@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191023.191320.2221170454789484606.davem@davemloft.net>
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 07:13:20PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
> Date: Tue, 22 Oct 2019 03:18:17 +0200
>
> > Before this change of_get_phy_mode() returned an enum,
> > phy_interface_t. On error, -ENODEV etc, is returned. If the result of
> > the function is stored in a variable of type phy_interface_t, and the
> > compiler has decided to represent this as an unsigned int, comparision
> > with -ENODEV etc, is a signed vs unsigned comparision.
> >
> > Fix this problem by changing the API. Make the function return an
> > error, or 0 on success, and pass a pointer, of type phy_interface_t,
> > where the phy mode should be stored.
> >
> > Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
>
> So now we have code that uses the 'interface' value without checking
> the error return value which means it's potentially uninitialized.
Hi David
If it did not check before, it was passing -ENODEV to something. So it
was already broken. But an uninitialized value is worse. I can see
about adding error checking where there are none.
> There are also a bunch of reverse christmas tree violations created
> by this patch as well :-) :-) :-)
I tried to avoid that, but a lot of drivers are not reverse christmas
to start with. In which case i tried to not break it any more. But i
can review my changes.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-24 2:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-22 1:18 [PATCH net-next] net: of_get_phy_mode: Change API to solve int/unit warnings Andrew Lunn
2019-10-24 2:13 ` David Miller
2019-10-24 2:49 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2019-10-24 4:33 ` David Miller
2019-10-24 8:46 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191024024935.GM5707@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).