From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A5CC43603 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 18:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039D420661 for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 18:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="Ac1tXdms" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729518AbfLDS1K (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:27:10 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-f193.google.com ([209.85.160.193]:38556 "EHLO mail-qt1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728926AbfLDS1I (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Dec 2019 13:27:08 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f193.google.com with SMTP id 14so755859qtf.5; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 10:27:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=rRv+rhzCfuGo++iU2PWMbxJtQJH0iLaP0UrU4w3CxNE=; b=Ac1tXdmsBCtajajEJA4vlvGErEJ0vRZ6ndVyEEaMDrDdGqhrfVzLnzbdSwpV0eO2D1 v/KYC8iohhIlOxuJz2YVC2fBGWOmEXvK6CzjOcEeqscDHUiaji4shP9NfBBBy6uJDExt UJhwwXdTIauV9neI//48hcMI49IIpntEcHzPTH4mkoQzFn7JEL93Q72pFAJn9/h1IBjj LGesVGxiJLArzH9/AfeN6pQBb+yNAkA9ZI7X3ti4HkE6NVdIaudOv/5r+pf81Ui9SjUW wUlwDCAzXQstSBePCPFMo20y2cg5uJBnRDs5TP0wTcPA6M9u7L3RJiH6uQl0ZLzvbS9T Qqlg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=rRv+rhzCfuGo++iU2PWMbxJtQJH0iLaP0UrU4w3CxNE=; b=rWY5H9om4L2pZA3XLiLa4Zh0Vt/3VQ7+sZb2AqVBG/mPNXjOZEhcacf+RpxLN72CpI wxZJbOKzYe7QesZOWyHGjbc/bYXArgTeeEprQCrMR5/pIXpze9cYSa13G6DeU/Lnyi5b MbISJgA3U8OOtOxCofotZC0upt8vtIarYF8W96/vrAv/qfY9QEsiGCbTqsNV+evaK0Uz hHoQKLLaFno5iqQpUs6HjHI2OvPP9flyPAn/CGa3hKb0BKHgU41wxvvJkxszQf52XwFY OmW7cCHJq7tOp0zkW7mYcmosRrqno4Oc6e5dm9yzxnKef30Vypnm1/1A5C3K7ADuTXn0 IBqA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWjuLF1Y64lRtHkmdbJlrQuuWFh+EDnGkOYZyMfAxMbTnY6tPv0 wSfJSEcJe5poKYKxljvn6dA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwvOr5+lvRpVjUWa75G4U3wtt6BZ7VAdjo63IVeH/Hs3f6PYd9m2mq3+4pXf30bM7guaM5mXQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:22c4:: with SMTP id g4mr4076060qta.45.1575484026971; Wed, 04 Dec 2019 10:27:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([177.220.176.179]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c6sm4086905qka.111.2019.12.04.10.27.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 04 Dec 2019 10:27:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 24F79C39A2; Wed, 4 Dec 2019 15:27:03 -0300 (-03) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2019 15:27:03 -0300 From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner To: Maciej =?utf-8?Q?=C5=BBenczykowski?= Cc: "David S . Miller" , Linux NetDev , Sean Tranchetti , Subash Abhinov Kasiviswanathan , Eric Dumazet , Linux SCTP Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: introduce ip_local_unbindable_ports sysctl Message-ID: <20191204182703.GA5057@localhost.localdomain> References: <20191127001313.183170-1-zenczykowski@gmail.com> <20191127131407.GA377783@localhost.localdomain> <20191127230001.GO388551@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.1 (2019-06-15) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 09:00:19PM +0100, Maciej Żenczykowski wrote: ... > I'm of the opinion that SELinux and other security policy modules > should be reserved for things related to system wide security policy. > Not for things that are more along the lines of 'functionality'. Makes sense. > > Also selinux has 'permissive' mode which causes the system to ignore > all selinux access controls (in favour of just logging) and this is > what is commonly used during development (because it's such a pain to > work with). Agree, this would be a big problem. IOW, "you don't have permission to access to this" != "you just can't use this, no matter what" FWIW, I rest my case :-) Thanks, Marcelo