From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: "Toke Høiland-Jørgensen" <toke@redhat.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
Martin Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf v2] bpftool: Don't crash on missing jited insns or ksyms
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 13:24:28 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210132428.4470a7b0@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87eexbhopo.fsf@toke.dk>
On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 22:09:55 +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> writes:
> > On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 19:14:12 +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
> >> When the kptr_restrict sysctl is set, the kernel can fail to return
> >> jited_ksyms or jited_prog_insns, but still have positive values in
> >> nr_jited_ksyms and jited_prog_len. This causes bpftool to crash when trying
> >> to dump the program because it only checks the len fields not the actual
> >> pointers to the instructions and ksyms.
> >>
> >> Fix this by adding the missing checks.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@redhat.com>
> >
> > Fixes: 71bb428fe2c1 ("tools: bpf: add bpftool")
> >
> > and
> >
> > Fixes: f84192ee00b7 ("tools: bpftool: resolve calls without using imm field")
> >
> > ?
>
> Yeah, guess so? Although I must admit it's not quite clear to me whether
> bpftool gets stable backports, or if it follows the "only moving
> forward" credo of libbpf?
bpftool does not have a GH repo, and seeing strength of Alexei's
arguments in the recent discussion - I don't think it will. So no
reason for bpftool to be "special" ❄️.
Then again seeing Andrii's zeal for pushing the codegen stuff into
bpftool, maybe Facebook's intention is to make it so.
Hard to tell what to do when standard practices don't apply, sigh.
> Anyhow, I don't suppose it'll hurt to have the Fixes: tag(s) in there;
> does Patchwork pick these up (or can you guys do that when you apply
> this?), or should I resend?
I don't think it does, but perhaps Daniel's scripts do.
Either way I don't think it's worth a resend.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-10 18:14 [PATCH bpf v2] bpftool: Don't crash on missing jited insns or ksyms Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-12-10 18:21 ` Martin Lau
2019-12-10 20:54 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-12-10 21:09 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-12-10 21:24 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-12-10 21:31 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-12-10 21:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-12-10 22:53 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2019-12-11 13:08 ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-12-11 13:20 ` Toke Høiland-Jørgensen
2019-12-11 13:33 ` Daniel Borkmann
2019-12-11 13:01 ` Daniel Borkmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191210132428.4470a7b0@cakuba.netronome.com \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kafai@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=toke@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).