From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>
Cc: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>,
maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: mvpp2: fix condition for setting up link interrupt
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 14:58:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191210145802.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191210145359.GA90089@kwain>
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 03:53:59PM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 04:42:36PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> >
> > Today, I received an email from Willy Tarreau about this issue which
> > persists to this day with mainline kernels.
> >
> > Willy reminded me that I've been carrying a fix for this, but because
> > of your concerns as stated above, I haven't bothered submitting it
> > through fear of causing regressions (which you seem to know about):
> >
> > http://git.armlinux.org.uk/cgit/linux-arm.git/commit/?h=mvpp2&id=67ef3bff255b26cc0d6def8ca99c4e8ae9937727
> >
> > Just like Thomas' case, the current code is broken for phylink when
> > in-band negotiation is being used - such as with the 1G/2.5G SFP
> > slot on the Macchiatobin.
> >
> > It seems that resolving the issue has stalled. Can I merge my patch,
> > or could you state exactly what the problems are with it so that
> > someone else can look into the issues please?
>
> Yes, please merge your patch (the one dropping the check on
> '!port->phylink'), I've been using it for months. I answered that patch
> submission back then[1] but it seems it was lost somehow :)
>
> Thanks!
> Antoine
>
> [1] https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg555697.html
Thanks. Looks like I never read your reply (probably got buried.)
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 14:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-01-24 13:18 [PATCH net] net: mvpp2: fix condition for setting up link interrupt Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-24 15:51 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-01-24 16:07 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-01-24 16:15 ` Andrew Lunn
2019-01-24 16:26 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-01-24 16:17 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-01-25 8:37 ` Antoine Tenart
2019-01-25 15:18 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
2019-12-08 16:42 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-12-08 17:14 ` Willy Tarreau
2019-12-10 14:53 ` Antoine Tenart
2019-12-10 14:58 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-01-24 16:15 ` Thomas Bogendoerfer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191210145802.GV25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tbogendoerfer@suse.de \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).