netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
To: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Cc: "jonathan.lemon@gmail.com" <jonathan.lemon@gmail.com>,
	"linyunsheng@huawei.com" <linyunsheng@huawei.com>,
	Li Rongqing <lirongqing@baidu.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org" <ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org>,
	brouer@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH][v2] page_pool: handle page recycle for NUMA_NO_NODE condition
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 19:49:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191211194933.15b53c11@carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9fecbff3518d311ec7c3aee9ae0315a73682a4af.camel@mellanox.com>

On Sat, 7 Dec 2019 03:52:41 +0000
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com> wrote:

> I don't think it is correct to check that the page nid is same as
> numa_mem_id() if pool is NUMA_NO_NODE. In such case we should allow all
> pages to recycle, because you can't assume where pages are allocated
> from and where they are being handled.

I agree, using numa_mem_id() is not valid, because it takes the numa
node id from the executing CPU and the call to __page_pool_put_page()
can happen on a remote CPU (e.g. cpumap redirect, and in future SKBs).


> I suggest the following:
> 
> return !page_pfmemalloc() && 
> ( page_to_nid(page) == pool->p.nid || pool->p.nid == NUMA_NO_NODE );

Above code doesn't generate optimal ASM code, I suggest:

 static bool pool_page_reusable(struct page_pool *pool, struct page *page)
 {
	return !page_is_pfmemalloc(page) &&
		pool->p.nid != NUMA_NO_NODE &&
		page_to_nid(page) == pool->p.nid;
 }

I have compiled different variants and looked at the ASM code generated
by GCC.  This seems to give the best result.


> 1) never recycle emergency pages, regardless of pool nid.
> 2) always recycle if pool is NUMA_NO_NODE.

Yes, this defines the semantics, that a page_pool configured with
NUMA_NO_NODE means skip NUMA checks.  I think that sounds okay...


> the above change should not add any overhead, a modest branch
> predictor will handle this with no effort.

It still annoys me that we keep adding instructions to this code
hot-path (I counted 34 bytes and 11 instructions in my proposed
function).

I think that it might be possible to move these NUMA checks to
alloc-side (instead of return/recycles side as today), and perhaps only
on slow-path when dequeuing from ptr_ring (as recycles that call
__page_pool_recycle_direct() will be pinned during NAPI).  But lets
focus on a smaller fix for the immediate issue...

-- 
Best regards,
  Jesper Dangaard Brouer
  MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
  LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-12-11 18:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-06  9:32 [PATCH][v2] page_pool: handle page recycle for NUMA_NO_NODE condition Li RongQing
2019-12-07  3:52 ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-12-09  1:31   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-12-09  3:47     ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2019-12-09  9:30       ` Ilias Apalodimas
2019-12-09 10:37         ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2019-12-09 12:14   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-12-09 23:34     ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-12-10  1:31       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-12-10  9:39         ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2019-12-10 14:52           ` Ilias Apalodimas
2019-12-10 19:56           ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-12-10 19:45         ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-12-11  3:01           ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-12-11  3:06             ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-12-11 20:57             ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-12-12  1:04               ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-12-10 15:02       ` Ilias Apalodimas
2019-12-10 20:02         ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-12-10 20:10           ` Ilias Apalodimas
2019-12-11 18:49   ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer [this message]
2019-12-11 21:24     ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-12-12  1:34       ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-12-12 10:18         ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-12-13  3:40           ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-12-13  6:27             ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2019-12-13  6:53               ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-12-13  8:48                 ` Jesper Dangaard Brouer
2019-12-16  1:51                   ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-12-16  4:02                     ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2019-12-16 10:13                       ` Ilias Apalodimas
2019-12-16 10:16                         ` Ilias Apalodimas
2019-12-16 10:57                           ` 答复: " Li,Rongqing
2019-12-17 19:38                         ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-12-17 19:35             ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-12-17 19:27           ` Saeed Mahameed
2019-12-16 12:15         ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-16 12:34           ` Ilias Apalodimas
2019-12-16 13:08             ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-16 13:21               ` Ilias Apalodimas
2019-12-17  2:11                 ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-12-17  9:11                   ` Michal Hocko
2019-12-19  2:09                     ` Yunsheng Lin
2019-12-19 11:53                       ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191211194933.15b53c11@carbon \
    --to=brouer@redhat.com \
    --cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
    --cc=jonathan.lemon@gmail.com \
    --cc=linyunsheng@huawei.com \
    --cc=lirongqing@baidu.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=saeedm@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).