From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 002EAC2D0C6 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 22:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D321B2054F for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 22:06:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726783AbfLKWG7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 17:06:59 -0500 Received: from correo.us.es ([193.147.175.20]:35928 "EHLO mail.us.es" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726524AbfLKWG6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 17:06:58 -0500 Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (unknown [192.168.2.11]) by mail.us.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738A1508CFF for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:06:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DE0DA70A for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:06:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix, from userid 99) id 5B789DA703; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:06:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from antivirus1-rhel7.int (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3C7DA70C; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:06:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from 192.168.1.97 (192.168.1.97) by antivirus1-rhel7.int (F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:06:53 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Status: clean(F-Secure/fsigk_smtp/550/antivirus1-rhel7.int) Received: from us.es (sys.soleta.eu [212.170.55.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: 1984lsi) by entrada.int (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 377154265A5A; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:06:53 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 23:06:53 +0100 X-SMTPAUTHUS: auth mail.us.es From: Pablo Neira Ayuso To: Xin Long Cc: network dev , netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net Subject: Re: [PATCH nf-next 3/7] netfilter: nft_tunnel: no need to call htons() when dumping ports Message-ID: <20191211220653.skv5habd6fs6abqk@salvia> References: <2c9abbd7ac3b89af9addb550bccb9169f47e39a2.1575779993.git.lucien.xin@gmail.com> <20191211215312.ratn33c52e5c4esz@salvia> <20191211220637.bsgevf3yx2zq7rcl@salvia> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191211220637.bsgevf3yx2zq7rcl@salvia> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:06:37PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 10:53:12PM +0100, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 08, 2019 at 12:41:33PM +0800, Xin Long wrote: > > > info->key.tp_src and tp_dst are __be16, when using nla_put_be16() > > > to dump them, htons() is not needed, so remove it in this patch. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xin Long > > > --- > > > net/netfilter/nft_tunnel.c | 4 ++-- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_tunnel.c b/net/netfilter/nft_tunnel.c > > > index d9d6c0d..e1184fa 100644 > > > --- a/net/netfilter/nft_tunnel.c > > > +++ b/net/netfilter/nft_tunnel.c > > > @@ -502,8 +502,8 @@ static int nft_tunnel_opts_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, > > > static int nft_tunnel_ports_dump(struct sk_buff *skb, > > > struct ip_tunnel_info *info) > > > { > > > - if (nla_put_be16(skb, NFTA_TUNNEL_KEY_SPORT, htons(info->key.tp_src)) < 0 || > > > - nla_put_be16(skb, NFTA_TUNNEL_KEY_DPORT, htons(info->key.tp_dst)) < 0) > > > + if (nla_put_be16(skb, NFTA_TUNNEL_KEY_SPORT, info->key.tp_src) < 0 || > > > + nla_put_be16(skb, NFTA_TUNNEL_KEY_DPORT, info->key.tp_dst) < 0) > > > > info->key.tp_src is already in __be16 as you describe. So I would take > > this as a consistency fix. I would take this as a fix. > > I mean, I think this is worth fixing it indeed. Acked-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso