From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
To: Josh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com>
Cc: <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>, David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: crash in __xfrm_state_lookup on 4.19 LTS
Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2019 14:21:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191212132132.GL8621@gauss3.secunet.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0b3ab776-2b8b-1725-d36e-70af66c138da@akamai.com>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 02:52:41PM -0800, Josh Hunt wrote:
> We've hit the following crash on a handful of machines recently running
> 4.19.55 LTS and strongswan. The kernels running on these machines do have
> some patches on top of 4.19 LTS, but nothing in the area of xfrm/ipsec:
>
> [54284.354997] general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
> [54284.355504] CPU: 6 PID: 11937 Comm: charon Tainted: G O L
> 4.19.55-4.19.2.4-amd64-2b86b5ea31726254 #1
> [54284.356382] Hardware name: Ciara Technologies 1x8-X6 SSD 32G
> 10GE/CangJie, BIOS CC1F110D 08/12/2014
> [54284.357322] RIP: 0010:__xfrm_state_lookup+0x7f/0x110
> [54284.357856] Code: d0 4a 8d 04 c0 48 8b 00 48 85 c0 74 68 41 89 cf 49 89
> d6 41 89 f5 eb 09 48 8b 43 28 48 85 c0 74 54 48 83 e8 28 48 89 c3 74 4b <66>
> 3b a8 d2 00 00 00 75 e5 44 3b 78 50
> 75 df 44 3a 60 54 75 d9 66
> [54284.359190] RSP: 0018:ffffab5043d93ad0 EFLAGS: 00010212
> [54284.359748] RAX: 6174735f79636e3d RBX: 6174735f79636e3d RCX:
> 0000000064959bc7
> [54284.360219] RDX: ffff9bb0593c3380 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI:
> ffffffff951071c0
> [54284.360713] RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000010 R09:
> 00000000001b950d
> [54284.361209] R10: 000000000000003f R11: 0000000096001849 R12:
> 0000000000000032
> [54284.361755] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: ffff9bb0593c3380 R15:
> 0000000064959bc7
> [54284.362255] FS: 00007facd7b01700(0000) GS:ffff9bb07fb80000(0000)
> knlGS:00000000000000000
> [54284.363198] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> [54284.363687] CR2: 00007f99250e89e0 CR3: 00000007e1078006 CR4:
> 00000000001606e0
> [54284.364156] Call Trace:
> [54284.364642] xfrm_state_add+0x108/0x290
> [54284.365113] xfrm_add_sa+0x9e6/0xb28 [xfrm_user]
> [54284.365580] ? xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x183/0x1a0 [xfrm_user]
> [54284.366077] xfrm_user_rcv_msg+0x183/0x1a0 [xfrm_user]
> [54284.366543] ? xfrm_dump_sa_done+0x30/0x30 [xfrm_user]
> [54284.367040] netlink_rcv_skb+0xde/0x110
> [54284.367504] xfrm_netlink_rcv+0x30/0x40 [xfrm_user]
> [54284.368000] netlink_unicast+0x191/0x230
> [54284.368463] netlink_sendmsg+0x2c4/0x390
> [54284.368958] sock_sendmsg+0x36/0x40
> [54284.369449] __sys_sendto+0xd8/0x150
> [54284.369940] ? kern_select+0xb9/0xe0
> [54284.370405] __x64_sys_sendto+0x24/0x30
> [54284.370946] do_syscall_64+0x4e/0x110
> [54284.383941] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
> [54284.384497] RIP: 0033:0x7face4679ad3
>
> (gdb) list *(__xfrm_state_lookup+0x7f)
> 0xffffffff8271beaf is in __xfrm_state_lookup (net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:841).
> warning: Source file is more recent than executable.
> 836 {
> 837 unsigned int h = xfrm_spi_hash(net, daddr, spi, proto, family);
> 838 struct xfrm_state *x;
> 839
> 840 hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(x, net->xfrm.state_byspi + h, byspi) {
> 841 if (x->props.family != family ||
> 842 x->id.spi != spi ||
> 843 x->id.proto != proto ||
> 844 !xfrm_addr_equal(&x->id.daddr, daddr, family))
> 845 continue;
>
> The above looks similar to these very old reports:
> https://wiki.strongswan.org/issues/2147
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84961
>
> Prior to the crash we are seeing softlockups and rcu stalls (see attached
> netconsole log file.) The RIP in those stalls/lockups appears to be in the
> same area as the crash reported above, lines 840 and 841.
>
> I've tried reproducing the problem in our lab, but have been unsuccessful so
> far and running the latest upstream kernel in production to see if that
> resolves the issue is not possible at the moment. It's very possible this
> crash was happening on earlier kernel versions in our network, I just don't
> have any data to confirm that.
Do you have any possibility to reproduce this on v4.19.55?
__xfrm_state_lookup() is called from process context and protected
by rcu_read_lock(). But updates to the above list can happen in
softirq context, so seems like we should disable BHs to prevent
beeing interrupted by a softirq that updates the list.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-12 13:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-11 22:52 crash in __xfrm_state_lookup on 4.19 LTS Josh Hunt
2019-12-12 13:21 ` Steffen Klassert [this message]
2019-12-12 20:44 ` Josh Hunt
2019-12-13 7:21 ` Steffen Klassert
2019-12-13 10:25 ` Florian Westphal
2019-12-13 11:13 ` Steffen Klassert
2019-12-16 20:34 ` Josh Hunt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191212132132.GL8621@gauss3.secunet.de \
--to=steffen.klassert@secunet.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=johunt@akamai.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox