From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tbogendoerfer@suse.de>,
maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: marvell: mvpp2: phylink requires the link interrupt
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 07:51:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191214075127.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191213163403.2a054262@cakuba.netronome.com>
On Fri, Dec 13, 2019 at 04:34:03PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Dec 2019 22:33:05 +0000, Russell King wrote:
> > phylink requires the MAC to report when its link status changes when
> > operating in inband modes. Failure to report link status changes
> > means that phylink has no idea when the link events happen, which
> > results in either the network interface's carrier remaining up or
> > remaining permanently down.
> >
> > For example, with a fiber module, if the interface is brought up and
> > link is initially established, taking the link down at the far end
> > will cut the optical power. The SFP module's LOS asserts, we
> > deactivate the link, and the network interface reports no carrier.
> >
> > When the far end is brought back up, the SFP module's LOS deasserts,
> > but the MAC may be slower to establish link. If this happens (which
> > in my tests is a certainty) then phylink never hears that the MAC
> > has established link with the far end, and the network interface is
> > stuck reporting no carrier. This means the interface is
> > non-functional.
> >
> > Avoiding the link interrupt when we have phylink is basically not
> > an option, so remove the !port->phylink from the test.
> >
> > Tested-by: Sven Auhagen <sven.auhagen@voleatech.de>
> > Tested-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
>
> Fixes: 4bb043262878 ("net: mvpp2: phylink support") ?
>
> Seems like you maybe didn't want this backported to stable hence
> no fixes tag?
Correct, because backporting just this patch will break the
Macchiatobin.
This patch is dependent on the previous two patches, which are more
about correct use of the API. I suspect if you try to backport the
series, things will get very hairly very quickly.
>
> Please advise :)
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> > index 111b3b8239e1..ef44c6979a31 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/marvell/mvpp2/mvpp2_main.c
> > @@ -3674,7 +3674,7 @@ static int mvpp2_open(struct net_device *dev)
> > valid = true;
> > }
> >
> > - if (priv->hw_version == MVPP22 && port->link_irq && !port->phylink) {
> > + if (priv->hw_version == MVPP22 && port->link_irq) {
> > err = request_irq(port->link_irq, mvpp2_link_status_isr, 0,
> > dev->name, port);
> > if (err) {
>
>
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-14 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-10 22:33 [PATCH] net: marvell: mvpp2: phylink requires the link interrupt Russell King
2019-12-14 0:34 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-12-14 7:19 ` Willy Tarreau
2019-12-14 7:51 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2019-12-14 7:56 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2019-12-14 8:24 ` Willy Tarreau
2019-12-14 18:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191214075127.GX25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=antoine.tenart@bootlin.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tbogendoerfer@suse.de \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).