From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Andy Roulin <aroulin@cumulusnetworks.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, dsahern@gmail.com,
nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com,
j.vosburgh@gmail.com, vfalico@gmail.com, andy@greyhouse.net,
stephen@networkplumber.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] bonding: move 802.3ad port state flags to uapi
Date: Sat, 14 Dec 2019 13:18:09 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191214131809.1f606978@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1576103458-22411-1-git-send-email-aroulin@cumulusnetworks.com>
On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:30:58 -0800, Andy Roulin wrote:
> The bond slave actor/partner operating state is exported as
> bitfield to userspace, which lacks a way to interpret it, e.g.,
> iproute2 only prints the state as a number:
>
> ad_actor_oper_port_state 15
>
> For userspace to interpret the bitfield, the bitfield definitions
> should be part of the uapi. The bitfield itself is defined in the
> 802.3ad standard.
>
> This commit moves the 802.3ad bitfield definitions to uapi.
>
> Related iproute2 patches, soon to be posted upstream, use the new uapi
> headers to pretty-print bond slave state, e.g., with ip -d link show
>
> ad_actor_oper_port_state_str <active,short_timeout,aggregating,in_sync>
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Roulin <aroulin@cumulusnetworks.com>
> Acked-by: Roopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Applied, I wonder if it wouldn't be better to rename those
s/AD_/BOND_3AD_/ like the prefix the stats have.
But I guess it's unlikely user space has those exact defines
set to a different value so can't cause a clash..
Thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-14 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-11 22:30 [PATCH net-next v2] bonding: move 802.3ad port state flags to uapi Andy Roulin
2019-12-11 22:47 ` Jay Vosburgh
2019-12-14 21:18 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-12-16 3:10 ` David Ahern
2019-12-16 3:13 ` Andy Gospodarek
2019-12-16 3:52 ` Jay Vosburgh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191214131809.1f606978@cakuba.netronome.com \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=aroulin@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=j.vosburgh@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=roopa@cumulusnetworks.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=vfalico@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).