From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Stefan Raspl <raspl@linux.ibm.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>,
Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 7/9] s390/qeth: stop yielding the ip_lock during IPv4 registration
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:34:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191218163450.36731-8-jwi@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191218163450.36731-1-jwi@linux.ibm.com>
As commit df2a2a5225cc ("s390/qeth: convert IP table spinlock to mutex")
converted the ip_lock to a mutex, we no longer have to yield it while
the subsequent IO sleep-waits for completion.
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3.h | 1 -
drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c | 34 ++-------------------------------
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3.h b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3.h
index 89fb91dad12e..6ccfe2121095 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3.h
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3.h
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ struct qeth_ipaddr {
struct hlist_node hnode;
enum qeth_ip_types type;
u8 is_multicast:1;
- u8 in_progress:1;
u8 disp_flag:2;
u8 ipato:1; /* ucast only */
diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
index 8bd3fc73a4fb..789d3b2ba0de 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_main.c
@@ -151,8 +151,6 @@ static int qeth_l3_delete_ip(struct qeth_card *card,
addr->ref_counter--;
if (addr->type == QETH_IP_TYPE_NORMAL && addr->ref_counter > 0)
return rc;
- if (addr->in_progress)
- return -EINPROGRESS;
if (qeth_card_hw_is_reachable(card))
rc = qeth_l3_deregister_addr_entry(card, addr);
@@ -213,29 +211,10 @@ static int qeth_l3_add_ip(struct qeth_card *card, struct qeth_ipaddr *tmp_addr)
return 0;
}
- /* qeth_l3_register_addr_entry can go to sleep
- * if we add a IPV4 addr. It is caused by the reason
- * that SETIP ipa cmd starts ARP staff for IPV4 addr.
- * Thus we should unlock spinlock, and make a protection
- * using in_progress variable to indicate that there is
- * an hardware operation with this IPV4 address
- */
- if (addr->proto == QETH_PROT_IPV4) {
- addr->in_progress = 1;
- mutex_unlock(&card->ip_lock);
- rc = qeth_l3_register_addr_entry(card, addr);
- mutex_lock(&card->ip_lock);
- addr->in_progress = 0;
- } else
- rc = qeth_l3_register_addr_entry(card, addr);
+ rc = qeth_l3_register_addr_entry(card, addr);
if (!rc || rc == -EADDRINUSE || rc == -ENETDOWN) {
addr->disp_flag = QETH_DISP_ADDR_DO_NOTHING;
- if (addr->ref_counter < 1) {
- qeth_l3_deregister_addr_entry(card, addr);
- hash_del(&addr->hnode);
- kfree(addr);
- }
} else {
hash_del(&addr->hnode);
kfree(addr);
@@ -303,19 +282,10 @@ static void qeth_l3_recover_ip(struct qeth_card *card)
hash_for_each_safe(card->ip_htable, i, tmp, addr, hnode) {
if (addr->disp_flag == QETH_DISP_ADDR_ADD) {
- if (addr->proto == QETH_PROT_IPV4) {
- addr->in_progress = 1;
- mutex_unlock(&card->ip_lock);
- rc = qeth_l3_register_addr_entry(card, addr);
- mutex_lock(&card->ip_lock);
- addr->in_progress = 0;
- } else
- rc = qeth_l3_register_addr_entry(card, addr);
+ rc = qeth_l3_register_addr_entry(card, addr);
if (!rc) {
addr->disp_flag = QETH_DISP_ADDR_DO_NOTHING;
- if (addr->ref_counter < 1)
- qeth_l3_delete_ip(card, addr);
} else {
hash_del(&addr->hnode);
kfree(addr);
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-18 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-18 16:34 [PATCH net-next 0/9] s390/qeth: features 2019-12-18 Julian Wiedmann
2019-12-18 16:34 ` [PATCH net-next 1/9] s390/qeth: only handle IRQs while device is online Julian Wiedmann
2019-12-18 16:34 ` [PATCH net-next 2/9] s390/qeth: wake up all waiters from qeth_irq() Julian Wiedmann
2019-12-18 16:34 ` [PATCH net-next 3/9] s390/qeth: overhaul L3 IP address dump code Julian Wiedmann
2019-12-18 16:34 ` [PATCH net-next 4/9] s390/qeth: clean up L3 sysfs code Julian Wiedmann
2019-12-18 16:34 ` [PATCH net-next 5/9] s390/qeth: remove open-coded inet_make_mask() Julian Wiedmann
2019-12-18 16:34 ` [PATCH net-next 6/9] s390/qeth: don't raise NETDEV_REBOOT event from L3 offline path Julian Wiedmann
2019-12-18 16:34 ` Julian Wiedmann [this message]
2019-12-18 16:34 ` [PATCH net-next 8/9] s390/qeth: consolidate helpers for capability checking Julian Wiedmann
2019-12-18 16:34 ` [PATCH net-next 9/9] s390/qeth: make use of napi_schedule_irqoff() Julian Wiedmann
2019-12-18 20:35 ` [PATCH net-next 0/9] s390/qeth: features 2019-12-18 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191218163450.36731-8-jwi@linux.ibm.com \
--to=jwi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=raspl@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).