From: Martin Varghese <martinvarghesenokia@gmail.com>
To: Pravin Shelar <pshelar@ovn.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
scott.drennan@nokia.com, Jiri Benc <jbenc@redhat.com>,
"Varghese,
Martin (Nokia - IN/Bangalore)" <martin.varghese@nokia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] openvswitch: New MPLS actions for layer 2 tunnelling
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2019 16:29:03 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191220105903.GA8821@martin-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAOrHB_CTqSYc7TBuVqU64f7TjLQNmggWg69zYxrLwrC0Sgjf=A@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Dec 18, 2019 at 07:50:52PM -0800, Pravin Shelar wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2019 at 10:56 PM Martin Varghese
> <martinvarghesenokia@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@nokia.com>
> >
> > The existing PUSH MPLS action inserts MPLS header between ethernet header
> > and the IP header. Though this behaviour is fine for L3 VPN where an IP
> > packet is encapsulated inside a MPLS tunnel, it does not suffice the L2
> > VPN (l2 tunnelling) requirements. In L2 VPN the MPLS header should
> > encapsulate the ethernet packet.
> >
> > The new mpls action PTAP_PUSH_MPLS inserts MPLS header at the start of the
> > packet or at the start of the l3 header depending on the value of l2 tunnel
> > flag in the PTAP_PUSH_MPLS arguments.
> >
> > POP_MPLS action is extended to support ethertype 0x6558.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Martin Varghese <martin.varghese@nokia.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - PTAP_POP_MPLS action removed.
> > - Special handling for ethertype 0 added in PUSH_MPLS.
> > - Refactored push_mpls function to cater existing push_mpls and
> > ptap_push_mpls actions.
> > - mac len to specify the MPLS header location added in PTAP_PUSH_MPLS
> > arguments.
> >
> > Changes in v3:
> > - Special handling for ethertype 0 removed.
> > - Added support for ether type 0x6558.
> > - Removed mac len from PTAP_PUSH_MPLS argument list
> > - used l2_tun flag to distinguish l2 and l3 tunnelling.
> > - Extended PTAP_PUSH_MPLS handling to cater PUSH_MPLS action also.
> >
> > Changes in v4:
> > - Removed extra blank lines.
> > - Replaced bool l2_tun with u16 tun flags in
> > struct ovs_action_ptap_push_mpls.
> >
> The patch looks almost ready. I have couple of comments.
>
> > include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > net/openvswitch/actions.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> > net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h b/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
> > index a87b44c..d9461ce 100644
> > --- a/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
> > +++ b/include/uapi/linux/openvswitch.h
> > @@ -673,6 +673,32 @@ struct ovs_action_push_mpls {
> > };
> >
> ...
> ...
> > diff --git a/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c b/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c
> > index 65c2e34..85fe7df 100644
> > --- a/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c
> > +++ b/net/openvswitch/flow_netlink.c
> > @@ -79,6 +79,7 @@ static bool actions_may_change_flow(const struct nlattr *actions)
> > case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_SET_MASKED:
> > case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_METER:
> > case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CHECK_PKT_LEN:
> > + case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_PTAP_PUSH_MPLS:
> > default:
> > return true;
> > }
> > @@ -3005,6 +3006,7 @@ static int __ovs_nla_copy_actions(struct net *net, const struct nlattr *attr,
> > [OVS_ACTION_ATTR_METER] = sizeof(u32),
> > [OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CLONE] = (u32)-1,
> > [OVS_ACTION_ATTR_CHECK_PKT_LEN] = (u32)-1,
> > + [OVS_ACTION_ATTR_PTAP_PUSH_MPLS] = sizeof(struct ovs_action_ptap_push_mpls),
> > };
> > const struct ovs_action_push_vlan *vlan;
> > int type = nla_type(a);
> > @@ -3072,6 +3074,33 @@ static int __ovs_nla_copy_actions(struct net *net, const struct nlattr *attr,
> > case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_RECIRC:
> > break;
> >
> > + case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_PTAP_PUSH_MPLS: {
> Can you change name of this action given this can handle both L2 and
> L3 MPLS tunneling?
>
ADD_MPLS ?
PUSH_INSERT_MPLS ?
anything else?
I prefer ADD_MPLS
> > + const struct ovs_action_ptap_push_mpls *mpls = nla_data(a);
> > +
> > + if (!eth_p_mpls(mpls->mpls_ethertype))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + if (!(mpls->tun_flags & OVS_MPLS_L2_TUNNEL_FLAG_MASK)) {
> > + if (vlan_tci & htons(VLAN_CFI_MASK) ||
> > + (eth_type != htons(ETH_P_IP) &&
> > + eth_type != htons(ETH_P_IPV6) &&
> > + eth_type != htons(ETH_P_ARP) &&
> > + eth_type != htons(ETH_P_RARP) &&
> > + !eth_p_mpls(eth_type)))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + mpls_label_count++;
> > + } else {
> > + if (mac_proto != MAC_PROTO_NONE) {
> It is better to check for 'MAC_PROTO_ETHERNET', rather than this negative test.
>
> > + mpls_label_count = 1;
> > + mac_proto = MAC_PROTO_NONE;
> > + } else {
> > + mpls_label_count++;
> > + }
> We need to either disallow combination of L3 and L2 MPLS_PUSH, POP
> actions in a action list or keep separate label count. Otherwise it is
> impossible to validate mpls labels stack depth in POP actions.
>
> > + }
> > + eth_type = mpls->mpls_ethertype;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > case OVS_ACTION_ATTR_PUSH_MPLS: {
> > const struct ovs_action_push_mpls *mpls = nla_data(a);
> >
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-20 10:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-18 6:47 [PATCH net-next v4 0/3] New openvswitch MPLS actions for layer 2 tunnelling Martin Varghese
2019-12-18 6:47 ` [PATCH net-next v4 1/3] net: skb_mpls_push() modified to allow MPLS header push at start of packet Martin Varghese
2019-12-18 6:48 ` [PATCH net-next v4 2/3] net: Rephrased comments section of skb_mpls_pop() Martin Varghese
2019-12-18 6:48 ` [PATCH net-next v4 3/3] openvswitch: New MPLS actions for layer 2 tunnelling Martin Varghese
2019-12-19 3:50 ` Pravin Shelar
2019-12-19 4:12 ` Martin Varghese
2019-12-20 1:07 ` Pravin Shelar
2019-12-20 3:04 ` Martin Varghese
2019-12-20 4:42 ` Martin Varghese
2019-12-20 5:17 ` Pravin Shelar
2019-12-20 10:59 ` Martin Varghese [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191220105903.GA8821@martin-VirtualBox \
--to=martinvarghesenokia@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jbenc@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.varghese@nokia.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pshelar@ovn.org \
--cc=scott.drennan@nokia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).