From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A1BCC00523 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 02:44:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA9C217F4 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2020 02:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="fVta00Hb" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727270AbgADCoZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jan 2020 21:44:25 -0500 Received: from mail-pg1-f194.google.com ([209.85.215.194]:44243 "EHLO mail-pg1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727074AbgADCoZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Jan 2020 21:44:25 -0500 Received: by mail-pg1-f194.google.com with SMTP id x7so24191088pgl.11; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 18:44:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GVVbPVx7gHQVvfWk7vlousq7bdc1Mt8QhmPFn2cIhCA=; b=fVta00HbjAJmANN0LLbWDiCHyXB0RqUCkXHrDQzrAmTQgKGtCil3QjvwdxUPOsjMkO ou5/FvLdO8T455OTqfch2wuzZIjJLx3uCzZbX+a8ZKLQ+6yNsH3i9CJIg5Uh1ZgGmzro G8k7cdmGN2ibOXv5dfdWPnnPRFDLhMSf3Rw3eaU0Z1seKcxwbqzTZjJk+AJF4ZIxWsTg M7UqWIVStnEdRzBXgiRR75el7IrZsGAub+XYOQWEFqmkqqTxIwZML8rVmr7ZOlgZKExr jvnOi/qeV7uidwvwiG1uW5m9Vjm16NbTJw7+v5cmwLq5KBkRoB6pvGht4n+/p8yh0843 tm+g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=GVVbPVx7gHQVvfWk7vlousq7bdc1Mt8QhmPFn2cIhCA=; b=ofe5ig8jFHESYOqZkFKwhSdxpt2IOMGTUxA72KpXaGPnvTpWWGaLVAPzbiowRdS+Uu W46FvEFdi4soCfR96Bx4IEeMVgTe3YAXn23byigGXAPPKyyq0NSMtCgYo25OJ/zJFs+e NgSnMppzuLqDnLMJT1wLap6dmdagHqO8eTw8VBivri45hxSJWCKq2skM9BmLLbKKYSBV wLKrWOMGZVzXnQeAkLMBXpn2jScOizQliBYi8a8zK0gUbbWzKO4F9FYXKqnm+t7LxDcb buBMMwQ+RSbyFUQDDXPOzmR90L5W928P7SVs4zx6wZuM42dRK443x7YOUXWuzBR9AmjN 0lJw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUKu0CTvX5777N9Bg2wAVQdunt/f1o59Q1Nydyl730z68px1TL0 lZalLglDncN5fGBWaLwOY1E= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxeivdPiC69dgxbXpNJQ5sWx9Tjf+1Jer7Cr8JLVfGV33oWOBDDuKJ1jUBt+bdLuGcRpM459Q== X-Received: by 2002:a63:1666:: with SMTP id 38mr102632884pgw.325.1578105864751; Fri, 03 Jan 2020 18:44:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (c-73-241-114-122.hsd1.ca.comcast.net. [73.241.114.122]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id x197sm71716924pfc.1.2020.01.03.18.44.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 03 Jan 2020 18:44:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 18:44:21 -0800 From: Richard Cochran To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Vladimir Oltean , David Miller , Vivien Didelot , Andrew Lunn , netdev , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] Improvements to the DSA deferred xmit Message-ID: <20200104024421.GB1445@localhost> References: <20191227014208.7189-1-olteanv@gmail.com> <20200102.134952.739616655559887645.davem@davemloft.net> <4866462c-9e2b-ed7c-03a9-a2e81decf0c7@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4866462c-9e2b-ed7c-03a9-a2e81decf0c7@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 12:10:44PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > I sincerely think your transmit path is so radically different that your > sja1105 driver should simply be absorbing all of this logic and the core > DSA framework should be free of any deferred transmit logic. Can you > consider doing that before the merge window ends? +1 Thanks, Richard