From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C269C33C8C for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:46:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC95F206DA for ; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 15:45:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="dbONFBNi" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728327AbgAGPp7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:45:59 -0500 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:59807 "EHLO out5-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727974AbgAGPp4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:45:56 -0500 Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846EB2223A; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:45:55 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 Jan 2020 10:45:55 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:date:from :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm1; bh=VhD0PZayJ3xJRZYzXxS8cB3S19qXZTSNrU5Hdd/uP8o=; b=dbONFBNi WosGfEkjwdHIMUWLnETO6Dot+yjRCQq2oYZ3t2EK/aUGrfqVo4q8RL5BdzHVCZRh Q6EfVAkpdj7Jimc/iCqNynIS4LMsMTOcw05B933y//PpG7IXLMUHITCZkIFCq9Zt tNrNqncj7G4Gor17gd2Ge841Bi3cvDocOK6EUmHUd6VyJSj2ZfDiaDQE3zCeIlQw uIK72zhc4wm67HvAcJDlkCdSSsyxRPFYZXVj4zFsha1jN9InSXcjo/BwqO0Xpq9/ 55j9UROJun7NvsNfRN/JMUHNu9bsJ6m8nGnt1HrWCrNGd/ZStjdaw74tRfQAlRuw OUsFFAvbhT1u7w== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedufedrvdehgedgfeegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkofgjfhgggfestdekre dtredttdenucfhrhhomhepkfguohcuufgthhhimhhmvghluceoihguohhstghhsehiugho shgthhdrohhrgheqnecukfhppeduleefrdegjedrudeihedrvdehudenucfrrghrrghmpe hmrghilhhfrhhomhepihguohhstghhsehiughoshgthhdrohhrghenucevlhhushhtvghr ufhiiigvpedu X-ME-Proxy: Received: from splinter.mtl.com (unknown [193.47.165.251]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E28578005C; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:45:53 -0500 (EST) From: Ido Schimmel To: netdev@vger.kernel.org Cc: davem@davemloft.net, jiri@mellanox.com, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, dsahern@gmail.com, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, mlxsw@mellanox.com, Ido Schimmel Subject: [PATCH net-next 05/10] mlxsw: spectrum_router: Separate nexthop offload indication from route Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2020 17:45:12 +0200 Message-Id: <20200107154517.239665-6-idosch@idosch.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.24.1 In-Reply-To: <20200107154517.239665-1-idosch@idosch.org> References: <20200107154517.239665-1-idosch@idosch.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org From: Ido Schimmel The driver currently uses the 'RTNH_F_OFFLOAD' flag for both routes and nexthops, which is cumbersome and unnecessary now that we have separate flag for the route itself. Separate the offload indication for nexthops from routes and call it whenever the offload state within the nexthop group changes. Note that IPv6 (unlike IPv4) does not share the same nexthop group between different routes, whereas mlxsw does. Therefore, whenever the offload indication within an IPv6 nexthop group changes, all the linked routes need to be updated. Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel Acked-by: Jiri Pirko --- .../ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 92 +++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c index 7f70aa799064..cbc23485f487 100644 --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c @@ -3235,20 +3235,6 @@ mlxsw_sp_nexthop_fib_entries_update(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, return 0; } -static void -mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_refresh(struct mlxsw_sp_fib_entry *fib_entry, - enum mlxsw_reg_ralue_op op, int err); - -static void -mlxsw_sp_nexthop_fib_entries_refresh(struct mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group *nh_grp) -{ - enum mlxsw_reg_ralue_op op = MLXSW_REG_RALUE_OP_WRITE_WRITE; - struct mlxsw_sp_fib_entry *fib_entry; - - list_for_each_entry(fib_entry, &nh_grp->fib_list, nexthop_group_node) - mlxsw_sp_fib_entry_offload_refresh(fib_entry, op, 0); -} - static void mlxsw_sp_adj_grp_size_round_up(u16 *p_adj_grp_size) { /* Valid sizes for an adjacency group are: @@ -3352,6 +3338,73 @@ mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group_rebalance(struct mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group *nh_grp) } } +static struct mlxsw_sp_nexthop * +mlxsw_sp_rt6_nexthop(struct mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group *nh_grp, + const struct mlxsw_sp_rt6 *mlxsw_sp_rt6); + +static void +mlxsw_sp_nexthop4_group_offload_refresh(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, + struct mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group *nh_grp) +{ + int i; + + for (i = 0; i < nh_grp->count; i++) { + struct mlxsw_sp_nexthop *nh = &nh_grp->nexthops[i]; + + if (nh->offloaded) + nh->key.fib_nh->fib_nh_flags |= RTNH_F_OFFLOAD; + else + nh->key.fib_nh->fib_nh_flags &= ~RTNH_F_OFFLOAD; + } +} + +static void +__mlxsw_sp_nexthop6_group_offload_refresh(struct mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group *nh_grp, + struct mlxsw_sp_fib6_entry *fib6_entry) +{ + struct mlxsw_sp_rt6 *mlxsw_sp_rt6; + + list_for_each_entry(mlxsw_sp_rt6, &fib6_entry->rt6_list, list) { + struct fib6_nh *fib6_nh = mlxsw_sp_rt6->rt->fib6_nh; + struct mlxsw_sp_nexthop *nh; + + nh = mlxsw_sp_rt6_nexthop(nh_grp, mlxsw_sp_rt6); + if (nh && nh->offloaded) + fib6_nh->fib_nh_flags |= RTNH_F_OFFLOAD; + else + fib6_nh->fib_nh_flags &= ~RTNH_F_OFFLOAD; + } +} + +static void +mlxsw_sp_nexthop6_group_offload_refresh(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, + struct mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group *nh_grp) +{ + struct mlxsw_sp_fib6_entry *fib6_entry; + + /* Unfortunately, in IPv6 the route and the nexthop are described by + * the same struct, so we need to iterate over all the routes using the + * nexthop group and set / clear the offload indication for them. + */ + list_for_each_entry(fib6_entry, &nh_grp->fib_list, + common.nexthop_group_node) + __mlxsw_sp_nexthop6_group_offload_refresh(nh_grp, fib6_entry); +} + +static void +mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group_offload_refresh(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, + struct mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group *nh_grp) +{ + switch (mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group_type(nh_grp)) { + case AF_INET: + mlxsw_sp_nexthop4_group_offload_refresh(mlxsw_sp, nh_grp); + break; + case AF_INET6: + mlxsw_sp_nexthop6_group_offload_refresh(mlxsw_sp, nh_grp); + break; + } +} + static void mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group_refresh(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, struct mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group *nh_grp) @@ -3425,6 +3478,8 @@ mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group_refresh(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, goto set_trap; } + mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group_offload_refresh(mlxsw_sp, nh_grp); + if (!old_adj_index_valid) { /* The trap was set for fib entries, so we have to call * fib entry update to unset it and use adjacency index. @@ -3446,9 +3501,6 @@ mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group_refresh(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, goto set_trap; } - /* Offload state within the group changed, so update the flags. */ - mlxsw_sp_nexthop_fib_entries_refresh(nh_grp); - return; set_trap: @@ -3461,6 +3513,7 @@ mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group_refresh(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, err = mlxsw_sp_nexthop_fib_entries_update(mlxsw_sp, nh_grp); if (err) dev_warn(mlxsw_sp->bus_info->dev, "Failed to set traps for fib entries.\n"); + mlxsw_sp_nexthop_group_offload_refresh(mlxsw_sp, nh_grp); if (old_adj_index_valid) mlxsw_sp_kvdl_free(mlxsw_sp, MLXSW_SP_KVDL_ENTRY_TYPE_ADJ, nh_grp->ecmp_size, nh_grp->adj_index); @@ -5113,6 +5166,11 @@ static int mlxsw_sp_nexthop6_group_get(struct mlxsw_sp *mlxsw_sp, &nh_grp->fib_list); fib6_entry->common.nh_group = nh_grp; + /* The route and the nexthop are described by the same struct, so we + * need to the update the nexthop offload indication for the new route. + */ + __mlxsw_sp_nexthop6_group_offload_refresh(nh_grp, fib6_entry); + return 0; } -- 2.24.1