From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30E4AC33CAD for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:20:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD183207FF for ; Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=wp.pl header.i=@wp.pl header.b="tDciLlzZ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726435AbgAMLUl (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 06:20:41 -0500 Received: from mx4.wp.pl ([212.77.101.11]:46321 "EHLO mx4.wp.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725992AbgAMLUl (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jan 2020 06:20:41 -0500 Received: (wp-smtpd smtp.wp.pl 24510 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2020 12:20:38 +0100 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=wp.pl; s=1024a; t=1578914439; bh=eF/JKh5FKeOw6oXd1ISCT/pJWk9xuIxNv1dDpFd5VXw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject; b=tDciLlzZEzzT/oBfWsrQxnnVfyZVrVIrGQkc9/AMPAl+nGp9X21iMdnhh3SJs1d6x Jmjmt+5XLBIQXFk7jueDPj753iaf5jq8EiKinjqpF22EBXdlag1HGZEDcb5TQ6wj7f L3UxqCzbHz1sOWTWr0G5HOol0vUc9ehpjBpy94YQ= Received: from c-73-93-4-247.hsd1.ca.comcast.net (HELO cakuba) (kubakici@wp.pl@[73.93.4.247]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp.wp.pl (WP-SMTPD) with ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted SMTP for ; 13 Jan 2020 12:20:38 +0100 Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 03:20:30 -0800 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jinpu Wang Cc: Jonathan Lemon , netdev , tariqt@mellanox.com, "David S. Miller" , kernel-team@fb.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] mlx4: Bump up MAX_MSIX from 64 to 128 Message-ID: <20200113032030.2fc9d891@cakuba> In-Reply-To: References: <20200109192317.4045173-1-jonathan.lemon@gmail.com> <20200112125055.512b65f6@cakuba> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WP-MailID: c869d747557a2131b45ee9da26a4aebd X-WP-AV: skaner antywirusowy Poczty Wirtualnej Polski X-WP-SPAM: NO 000000A [UeOk] Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:47:59 +0100, Jinpu Wang wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:51 PM Jakub Kicinski wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 11:23:17 -0800, Jonathan Lemon wrote: > > > On modern hardware with a large number of cpus and using XDP, > > > the current MSIX limit is insufficient. Bump the limit in > > > order to allow more queues. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Lemon > > > > Applied to net-next, thanks everyone! > > > > (Jack, please make sure you spell your tags right) > Checked, It's correct both in my reply and in net-next.git. I manually corrected it in tree. You swapped 'i' and 'e' in the word reviewed, your email had "reveiwed".