Re: [PATCH net] l2tp: Allow duplicate session creation with UDP

[Tom Parkin <tparkin@katalix.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1601 bytes --]

On  Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:34:47 +1300, Ridge Kennedy wrote:
> In the past it was possible to create multiple L2TPv3 sessions with the
> same session id as long as the sessions belonged to different tunnels.
> The resulting sessions had issues when used with IP encapsulated tunnels,
> but worked fine with UDP encapsulated ones. Some applications began to
> rely on this behaviour to avoid having to negotiate unique session ids.
> 
> Some time ago a change was made to require session ids to be unique across
> all tunnels, breaking the applications making use of this "feature".
> 
> This change relaxes the duplicate session id check to allow duplicates
> if both of the colliding sessions belong to UDP encapsulated tunnels.

I appreciate what you're saying with respect to buggy applications,
however I think the existing kernel code is consistent with RFC 3931,
which makes session IDs unique for a given LCCE.

Given how the L2TP data packet headers work for L2TPv3, I'm assuming
that sessions in UDP-encapsulated tunnels work even if their session
IDs clash because the tunnel sockets are using distinct UDP ports
which will effectively separate the data traffic into the "correct"
tunnel.  Obviously the same thing doesn't apply for IP-encap.

However, there's nothing to prevent user space from using the same UDP
port for multiple tunnels, at which point this relaxation of the RFC
rules would break down again.

Since UDP-encap can also be broken in the face of duplicated L2TPv3
session IDs, I think its better that the kernel continue to enforce
the RFC.

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]