From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E32CBC2D0DB for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 21:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B404E20716 for ; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 21:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="Zj+B3O+s" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727430AbgAYVF6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jan 2020 16:05:58 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:54328 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726690AbgAYVF6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Jan 2020 16:05:58 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=rXIsDSjvBRJPY7sgoaos1PgdMBf/Hm8O/MfyenIDSWQ=; b=Zj+B3O+sfM8ZtDxinO/YcfLxko yK7CDhEqdcrQpiXZx52lxq7gO2ctW3Xbbt6mLnAQYHHd4VPaFdThxh6s25+tWYV9mO2yVLTB/Ntl3 n7ImZAxeGFnMIMLJ0mZWjL1b2lOSXLkUP5XPhqcS72Q0S3Qcqhnhx0qdLZ4Aht3I49bY=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1ivSco-0007q7-Gx; Sat, 25 Jan 2020 22:05:50 +0100 Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2020 22:05:50 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Jakub Kicinski Cc: Saeed Mahameed , "David S. Miller" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Aya Levin , Eran Ben Elisha , Florian Fainelli , Heiner Kallweit , Russell King , Michal Kubecek Subject: Re: [net-next V2 11/14] ethtool: Add support for low latency RS FEC Message-ID: <20200125210550.GH18311@lunn.ch> References: <20200125051039.59165-1-saeedm@mellanox.com> <20200125051039.59165-12-saeedm@mellanox.com> <20200125114037.203e63ca@cakuba> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200125114037.203e63ca@cakuba> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 11:40:37AM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Sat, 25 Jan 2020 05:11:52 +0000, Saeed Mahameed wrote: > > From: Aya Levin > > > > Add support for low latency Reed Solomon FEC as LLRS. > > > > Signed-off-by: Aya Levin > > Reviewed-by: Eran Ben Elisha > > Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed > > This is kind of buried in the midst of the driver patches. > It'd preferably be a small series of its own. > Let's at least try to CC PHY folk now. Thanks Jakuv > Is this from some standard? A reference would be good. I assume the existing ETHTOOL_LINK_MODE_FEC_RS_BIT is for Clause 91. What clause does this LLRS refer to? Thanks Andrew