From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC6F0C35247 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94DCD2083E for ; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 15:39:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="WjIF5nX6" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726612AbgAZPjW (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jan 2020 10:39:22 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:54678 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725944AbgAZPjW (ORCPT ); Sun, 26 Jan 2020 10:39:22 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=qtE+IzNrdxXTltJQJXlBufW7IZUuYC1+jN7ZQ7mwQMo=; b=WjIF5nX6yM3ovyQ081Z22B5++a IuiKbQWTFnFIhdnF6sOXMjS63TlK8CPYr9hJ56t1w7M9g473u++CIoAqPldJrWHcj9kAmSP7SpfV5 fvmCaSUTASp5JhN63bUogAWapvwoHmwZfGRu/ZDV5ceDIQo/03OzwPvOVqKKy5YEf46Y=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1ivk0J-00025J-1o; Sun, 26 Jan 2020 16:39:15 +0100 Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2020 16:39:15 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Horatiu Vultur Cc: "Allan W. Nielsen" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bridge@lists.linux-foundation.org, jiri@resnulli.us, ivecera@redhat.com, davem@davemloft.net, roopa@cumulusnetworks.com, nikolay@cumulusnetworks.com, anirudh.venkataramanan@intel.com, olteanv@gmail.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v3 03/10] net: bridge: mrp: Add MRP interface used by netlink Message-ID: <20200126153915.GI18311@lunn.ch> References: <20200124161828.12206-1-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> <20200124161828.12206-4-horatiu.vultur@microchip.com> <20200124174315.GC13647@lunn.ch> <20200125113726.ousbmm4n3ab4xnqt@soft-dev3.microsemi.net> <20200125152023.GA18311@lunn.ch> <20200125191612.5dlzlvb7g2bucqna@lx-anielsen.microsemi.net> <20200126132843.k4rzn7vfti7lqvos@soft-dev3.microsemi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200126132843.k4rzn7vfti7lqvos@soft-dev3.microsemi.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > We could do also that. The main reason why I have added a new generic > netlink was that I thought it would be clearer what commands are for MRP > configuration. The naming makes this clear, having _MRP_ in the attribute names etc. But it would be good have input from the Bridge maintainers. Andrew