[PATCH 4.19 01/92] can, slip: Protect tty->disc_data in write_wakeup and close with RCU

[PATCH 4.19 01/92] can, slip: Protect tty->disc_data in write_wakeup and close with RCU

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>

[ Upstream commit 0ace17d56824165c7f4c68785d6b58971db954dd ]

write_wakeup can happen in parallel with close/hangup where tty->disc_data
is set to NULL and the netdevice is freed thus also freeing
disc_data. write_wakeup accesses disc_data so we must prevent close from
freeing the netdev while write_wakeup has a non-NULL view of
tty->disc_data.

We also need to make sure that accesses to disc_data are atomic. Which can
all be done with RCU.

This problem was found by Syzkaller on SLCAN, but the same issue is
reproducible with the SLIP line discipline using an LTP test based on the
Syzkaller reproducer.

A fix which didn't use RCU was posted by Hillf Danton.

Fixes: 661f7fda21b1 ("slip: Fix deadlock in write_wakeup")
Fixes: a8e83b17536a ("slcan: Port write_wakeup deadlock fix from slip")
Reported-by: syzbot+017e491ae13c0068598a@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Richard Palethorpe <rpalethorpe@suse.com>
Cc: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Tyler Hall <tylerwhall@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-can@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: syzkaller@googlegroups.com
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/can/slcan.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 drivers/net/slip/slip.c |   12 ++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/can/slcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/slcan.c
@@ -343,9 +343,16 @@ static void slcan_transmit(struct work_s
  */
 static void slcan_write_wakeup(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
-	struct slcan *sl = tty->disc_data;
+	struct slcan *sl;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	sl = rcu_dereference(tty->disc_data);
+	if (!sl)
+		goto out;
 
 	schedule_work(&sl->tx_work);
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 /* Send a can_frame to a TTY queue. */
@@ -640,10 +647,11 @@ static void slcan_close(struct tty_struc
 		return;
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&sl->lock);
-	tty->disc_data = NULL;
+	rcu_assign_pointer(tty->disc_data, NULL);
 	sl->tty = NULL;
 	spin_unlock_bh(&sl->lock);
 
+	synchronize_rcu();
 	flush_work(&sl->tx_work);
 
 	/* Flush network side */
--- a/drivers/net/slip/slip.c
+++ b/drivers/net/slip/slip.c
@@ -452,9 +452,16 @@ static void slip_transmit(struct work_st
  */
 static void slip_write_wakeup(struct tty_struct *tty)
 {
-	struct slip *sl = tty->disc_data;
+	struct slip *sl;
+
+	rcu_read_lock();
+	sl = rcu_dereference(tty->disc_data);
+	if (!sl)
+		goto out;
 
 	schedule_work(&sl->tx_work);
+out:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 }
 
 static void sl_tx_timeout(struct net_device *dev)
@@ -882,10 +889,11 @@ static void slip_close(struct tty_struct
 		return;
 
 	spin_lock_bh(&sl->lock);
-	tty->disc_data = NULL;
+	rcu_assign_pointer(tty->disc_data, NULL);
 	sl->tty = NULL;
 	spin_unlock_bh(&sl->lock);
 
+	synchronize_rcu();
 	flush_work(&sl->tx_work);
 
 	/* VSV = very important to remove timers */

[PATCH 4.19 19/92] tcp_bbr: improve arithmetic division in bbr_update_bw()

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

From: Wen Yang <wenyang@linux.alibaba.com>

[ Upstream commit 5b2f1f3070b6447b76174ea8bfb7390dc6253ebd ]

do_div() does a 64-by-32 division. Use div64_long() instead of it
if the divisor is long, to avoid truncation to 32-bit.
And as a nice side effect also cleans up the function a bit.

Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wenyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>
Cc: Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
@@ -680,8 +680,7 @@ static void bbr_update_bw(struct sock *s
 	 * bandwidth sample. Delivered is in packets and interval_us in uS and
 	 * ratio will be <<1 for most connections. So delivered is first scaled.
 	 */
-	bw = (u64)rs->delivered * BW_UNIT;
-	do_div(bw, rs->interval_us);
+	bw = div64_long((u64)rs->delivered * BW_UNIT, rs->interval_us);
 
 	/* If this sample is application-limited, it is likely to have a very
 	 * low delivered count that represents application behavior rather than