From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D708C11D24 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 07:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3555420675 for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 07:02:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=resnulli-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@resnulli-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="EsEpzn2H" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726765AbgBXHCc (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 02:02:32 -0500 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:41660 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726509AbgBXHCc (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 02:02:32 -0500 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id c9so8986949wrw.8 for ; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 23:02:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=resnulli-us.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=3oO9LdaDkUb+0hGjr6jAjsrZrAjI19aWDb4hbRbnuaE=; b=EsEpzn2HHhzqo0EIEK4PfMiMcBJJ4+/9VeqUhdFFFiz/yIBAe+kIMMk4jM59I5tVrz aBys1us1Iel2VL4FVEhcGuXhyoTXkZUHgnU+N+s6cmgw9VWyVS0vg9VmK9AyOzLfKAT8 WkMhLk8zQUfr0fT1PMHR4b1KVCZ9uJgtWZPyUfG3hFjNF3HPGmlmIrotE/cL6Flv2KB+ /XnNUdVIPShL6O5B4sAxiS8o0fpJrG5pph2OT5Oh/gcNKOXLgiTkBkxE5K4E84oa421A zGJvKA02JoGthudbMXOkOW7GifrDUGRKdfYBu5dJwHLMSZr7zt8K5tRWq6I9Od6GJkFa gpQw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=3oO9LdaDkUb+0hGjr6jAjsrZrAjI19aWDb4hbRbnuaE=; b=NGeHxfO7UniZbtk93AVRgIO6tkVTZf3akhIprZTCskhs/VEuNF01j54lNIzdD4f0bw l0PLB3loOgmy9XbC5xARhjlXrqsfqr08WTsB21L7fhDIEf1X3+VXyBRL3Gv03XURQ7iB 5aOJPXpb/0n/Lj7QxHxHwbvzDDG0s0fa34+COoPem8s2ULDemIGOmEuQ3ZK3+sbF8eN5 vZ7LVbseUA2TTgsNFyAtt9/rhkA0mFWjSfkesKnGp9s/yfhrBWz6Sn+4sVulzzhCdx6K VApLYyI3i038mzyzwcJa3f0JKWgyNhXLcVF7KW67QGTfh2XoN3cHIvHnb217D5WuWPIa +h7A== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUo94SikMGqJPL1EKGPgjE8lCYOG5d0oWHykTNiat94WmnzMsGW FHJuIN27XNjuV/rZufYwQtkgVg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzxV/alViSQMOvg9tweT1vy9Pic4/BcCj+ChkhktRArv+jPk0j/9UuLQ1L+2SCrsA8o71zfHg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4f89:: with SMTP id d9mr64929908wru.391.1582527750045; Sun, 23 Feb 2020 23:02:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ip-89-177-130-96.net.upcbroadband.cz. [89.177.130.96]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h18sm17912506wrv.78.2020.02.23.23.02.29 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 23 Feb 2020 23:02:29 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 08:02:28 +0100 From: Jiri Pirko To: David Miller Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org, idosch@mellanox.com, mlxsw@mellanox.com Subject: Re: [patch net-next 00/12] mlxsw: Cosmetic fixes Message-ID: <20200224070228.GA16270@nanopsycho> References: <20200223073144.28529-1-jiri@resnulli.us> <20200223.161311.2119739902658169966.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200223.161311.2119739902658169966.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 01:13:11AM CET, davem@davemloft.net wrote: >From: Jiri Pirko >Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2020 08:31:32 +0100 > >> From: Jiri Pirko >> >> This is a set of mainly action/trap related cosmetic fixes. >> No functional changes. > >Series applied, thanks Jiri. > >The final patch removing unused PCI values didn't apply cleanly and >had some fuzz... Ah, you are right, there is a patch targetted to -net in our queue changing MLXSW_PCI_SW_RESET_WAIT_MSECS value. That's the reason for the fuzz. No problem. Thanks!