From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
Sebastian Sewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@intel.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: [patch V3 18/22] bpf: Replace open coded recursion prevention in sys_bpf()
Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:01:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200224145644.317843926@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200224140131.461979697@linutronix.de
The required protection is that the caller cannot be migrated to a
different CPU as these functions end up in places which take either a hash
bucket lock or might trigger a kprobe inside the memory allocator. Both
scenarios can lead to deadlocks. The deadlock prevention is per CPU by
incrementing a per CPU variable which temporarily blocks the invocation of
BPF programs from perf and kprobes.
Replace the open coded preempt_[dis|en]able and __this_cpu_[inc|dec] pairs
with the new helper functions. These functions are already prepared to make
BPF work on PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels. No functional change for !RT
kernels.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
V3: Restrict it to sys_bpf(). Hashtab code is already handled.
---
kernel/bpf/syscall.c | 27 ++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
@@ -171,11 +171,7 @@ static int bpf_map_update_value(struct b
flags);
}
- /* must increment bpf_prog_active to avoid kprobe+bpf triggering from
- * inside bpf map update or delete otherwise deadlocks are possible
- */
- preempt_disable();
- __this_cpu_inc(bpf_prog_active);
+ bpf_disable_instrumentation();
if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH ||
map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH) {
err = bpf_percpu_hash_update(map, key, value, flags);
@@ -206,8 +202,7 @@ static int bpf_map_update_value(struct b
err = map->ops->map_update_elem(map, key, value, flags);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
- __this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
- preempt_enable();
+ bpf_enable_instrumentation();
maybe_wait_bpf_programs(map);
return err;
@@ -222,8 +217,7 @@ static int bpf_map_copy_value(struct bpf
if (bpf_map_is_dev_bound(map))
return bpf_map_offload_lookup_elem(map, key, value);
- preempt_disable();
- this_cpu_inc(bpf_prog_active);
+ bpf_disable_instrumentation();
if (map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_PERCPU_HASH ||
map->map_type == BPF_MAP_TYPE_LRU_PERCPU_HASH) {
err = bpf_percpu_hash_copy(map, key, value);
@@ -268,8 +262,7 @@ static int bpf_map_copy_value(struct bpf
rcu_read_unlock();
}
- this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
- preempt_enable();
+ bpf_enable_instrumentation();
maybe_wait_bpf_programs(map);
return err;
@@ -1136,13 +1129,11 @@ static int map_delete_elem(union bpf_att
goto out;
}
- preempt_disable();
- __this_cpu_inc(bpf_prog_active);
+ bpf_disable_instrumentation();
rcu_read_lock();
err = map->ops->map_delete_elem(map, key);
rcu_read_unlock();
- __this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
- preempt_enable();
+ bpf_enable_instrumentation();
maybe_wait_bpf_programs(map);
out:
kfree(key);
@@ -1254,13 +1245,11 @@ int generic_map_delete_batch(struct bpf_
break;
}
- preempt_disable();
- __this_cpu_inc(bpf_prog_active);
+ bpf_disable_instrumentation();
rcu_read_lock();
err = map->ops->map_delete_elem(map, key);
rcu_read_unlock();
- __this_cpu_dec(bpf_prog_active);
- preempt_enable();
+ bpf_enable_instrumentation();
maybe_wait_bpf_programs(map);
if (err)
break;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-24 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-24 14:01 [patch V3 00/22] bpf: Make BPF and PREEMPT_RT co-exist Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 01/22] bpf: Tighten the requirements for preallocated hash maps Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 02/22] bpf: Enforce preallocation for instrumentation programs on RT Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 03/22] bpf: Update locking comment in hashtab code Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 04/22] bpf/tracing: Remove redundant preempt_disable() in __bpf_trace_run() Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 05/22] bpf/trace: Remove EXPORT from trace_call_bpf() Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 18:16 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 06/22] bpf/trace: Remove redundant preempt_disable " Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 19:40 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-02-24 20:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-25 0:33 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-02-25 12:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 07/22] perf/bpf: Remove preempt disable around BPF invocation Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 08/22] bpf: Remove recursion prevention from rcu free callback Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 09/22] bpf: Dont iterate over possible CPUs with interrupts disabled Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 10/22] bpf: Provide bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() helper Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 18:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 18:41 ` [patch V4 " Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 11/22] bpf: Replace cant_sleep() with cant_migrate() Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 12/22] bpf: Use bpf_prog_run_pin_on_cpu() at simple call sites Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 13/22] bpf/tests: Use migrate disable instead of preempt disable Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 14/22] bpf: Use migrate_disable/enabe() in trampoline code Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 15/22] bpf: Use migrate_disable/enable in array macros and cgroup/lirc code Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 16/22] bpf: Provide recursion prevention helpers Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 17/22] bpf: Use recursion prevention helpers in hashtab code Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 19/22] bpf: Factor out hashtab bucket lock operations Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 20/22] bpf: Prepare hashtab locking for PREEMPT_RT Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 21/22] bpf, lpm: Make locking RT friendly Thomas Gleixner
2020-02-24 14:01 ` [patch V3 22/22] bpf/stackmap: Dont trylock mmap_sem with PREEMPT_RT and interrupts disabled Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200224145644.317843926@linutronix.de \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vinicius.gomes@intel.com \
--cc=williams@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).