From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29E8C4BA00 for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6552176D for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 22:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="gbA5lK2w" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728818AbgBYWFf (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:05:35 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:34146 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726607AbgBYWFe (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Feb 2020 17:05:34 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=5Nu7vVzAgRjIOT3nTKCs9kz7QufjSh2yf/3fHkW8+Zs=; b=gbA5lK2wqlsFBRMia+r1AyPz0b tI5grpHd3hS6O4tWDbZ00K4LMxYGrInJxRaPM1+HdS6L2NmzX4Rzcldr7uaWM+89LuY7SvascB2hS z0etRRCqMroh8OIE8DqzS5i5I0z+1yetLDNfPvOgSHhd5fA1cAyybEWNz5Z1Xpovpu1U=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1j6iKZ-0001ct-9M; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 23:05:31 +0100 Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 23:05:31 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Vadym Kochan Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "David S . Miller" , Oleksandr Mazur , Taras Chornyi , Serhiy Boiko , Andrii Savka , Volodymyr Mytnyk , Serhiy Pshyk Subject: Re: [RFC net-next 1/3] net: marvell: prestera: Add Switchdev driver for Prestera family ASIC device 98DX325x (AC3x) Message-ID: <20200225220531.GH7663@lunn.ch> References: <20200225163025.9430-1-vadym.kochan@plvision.eu> <20200225163025.9430-2-vadym.kochan@plvision.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200225163025.9430-2-vadym.kochan@plvision.eu> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > +static int mvsw_pr_port_obj_attr_set(struct net_device *dev, > + const struct switchdev_attr *attr, > + struct switchdev_trans *trans) > +{ > + int err = 0; > + struct mvsw_pr_port *port = netdev_priv(dev); > + > + switch (attr->id) { > + case SWITCHDEV_ATTR_ID_PORT_STP_STATE: > + err = -EOPNOTSUPP; > + break; That is interesting. Is the linux bridge happy with this? Particularly when you have other interfaces in the Linux SW bridge, which cause a loop via the switch ports? I assume the network then dies in a broadcast storm, since there is nothing Linux can do to solve the loop. Andrew