From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] AT8031 PHY timestamping support
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 10:15:07 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200228181507.GA4744@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200228180226.22986-1-michael@walle.cc>
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 07:02:24PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
> (1) The PHY doesn't support atomic reading of the (timestamp,
> messageType, sequenceId) tuple. The workaround is to read the
> timestamp again and check if it has changed. Actually, you'd have
> to read the complete tuple again.
This HW is broken by design :(
> But if you're using a P2P clock with peer delay requests this whole
> thing falls apart because of caveat (3). You'll often see messages like
> received SYNC without timestamp
> or
> received PDELAY_RESP without timestamp
> in linuxptp. Sometimes it working for some time and then it starts to
> loosing packets. I suspect this depends on how the PDELAY messages are
> interleaved with the SYNC message. If there is not enough time to until
> the next event message is received either of these two messages won't
> have a timestamp.
And even the case where a Sync and a DelayResp arrive at nearly the
same time will fail.
> The PHY also supports appending the timestamp to the actual ethernet frame,
> but this seems to only work when the PHY is connected via RGMII. I've never
> get it to work with a SGMII connection.
This is the way to go. I would try to get the vendor's help in making
this work.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-28 18:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-28 18:02 [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] AT8031 PHY timestamping support Michael Walle
2020-02-28 18:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/2] net: phy: let the driver register its own IRQ handler Michael Walle
2020-02-28 18:02 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] net: phy: at803x: add PTP support for AR8031 Michael Walle
2020-03-01 12:22 ` Richard Cochran
2020-02-28 18:15 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2020-02-28 19:43 ` [RFC PATCH v2 0/2] AT8031 PHY timestamping support Michael Walle
2020-02-29 14:48 ` Richard Cochran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200228181507.GA4744@localhost \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).