From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9280AC3F2CD for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 23:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BD0D246AF for ; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 23:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="XvmPksJe" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726994AbgB1XOq (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 18:14:46 -0500 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:34064 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726046AbgB1XOp (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Feb 2020 18:14:45 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=8pDsHz6RetCNui6JYWKr66Fx8NY1FuyyASaCfvg/lxg=; b=XvmPksJeCDRXQQ5cf5W6h+Oyq 07ckpCnqKtXSeEZHq0eDZjLkdffizLd1S1gB8DyrRI+E7yTcx29QP5VTQqjOhsXngaXGCncZj7FCU GV9Uj6UZvOljifCkTCmiGkq5WEKu+tQcukwSjaT6xeJVNwyIGSS3zGpwYwAZzWZ9y7MjlkRYkKC+x NT19YcagLlX7y/IukSvsABe8EeZr3xuT3uNFWvFDi+CXmQR0dS65zJ6i5vCq4JO8KZwRnNhSLCvIc F+9VR5aYhdF3Wpe7F2kuCzk6ZsSbhkSIVYZamt0gFxkagG/n1sNUSJs2o6kZ3fNP+/sbqhjGNdahW Ez8iyOR+g==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([fd8f:7570:feb6:1:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:58244) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j7oq3-0006ca-Vk; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 23:14:36 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j7oq1-0002N1-7N; Fri, 28 Feb 2020 23:14:33 +0000 Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2020 23:14:33 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Oleksij Rempel Cc: Chris Snook , Jay Cliburn , Pengutronix Kernel Team , "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, Vivien Didelot Subject: Re: [PATCH v9] net: ag71xx: port to phylink Message-ID: <20200228231433.GW25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20200228145049.17602-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200228145049.17602-1-o.rempel@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 03:50:49PM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > The port to phylink was done as close as possible to initial > functionality. > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel Looks fine from a phylink point of view now, thanks. Acked-by: Russell King -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up