From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3324C3F2D7 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 15:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75977217F4 for ; Wed, 4 Mar 2020 15:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="Rcxv8wkf" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729745AbgCDP2x (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:28:53 -0500 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:45576 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726650AbgCDP2x (ORCPT ); Wed, 4 Mar 2020 10:28:53 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=x30yDmZgR88IH5jCGtl6A2Rh5dtdI+huFbLm4TgEaJY=; b=Rcxv8wkfn7VxLvNqIF7RivlY6m 9iROJ3LadRfR1i1aqzdf6I1IWz1KyOBpZwBpBUiOztcoNz6ICm2rEBz74hGAhSl21z6+F9oZDsR3V ZOxVbcFfd5J9oqZyU809qj6hXjtB1I16vWhaKRv03oO11wqc39aRDS0hhkUKs6N3CNnw=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1j9Vx3-0006dJ-5O; Wed, 04 Mar 2020 16:28:49 +0100 Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:28:49 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Hau Cc: Kai-Heng Feng , Heiner Kallweit , Linux Netdev List , Kernel development list , Anthony Wong , Jason Yen Subject: Re: SFP+ support for 8168fp/8117 Message-ID: <20200304152849.GE3553@lunn.ch> References: <02F7CBDE-B877-481C-A5AF-2F4CBF830A2C@canonical.com> <80E9C881-91C8-4F29-B9CE-652F9EE0B018@canonical.com> <995bddbc4f9d48cbb3a289a7e9799f15@realtek.com> <12EA7285-06D7-44D3-B033-4F52A06123CC@canonical.com> <9AAC75D4-B04F-49CD-BBB9-11AE3382E4D8@canonical.com> <5A21808E-C9DA-44BF-952B-4A5077B52E9B@canonical.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Hi Kai-Heng, > > For adding SFP+ support for rtl8168fp, > 1.Some power saving features must be disabled, like APDLS/EEE/EEEPLUS... > 2.PHY capability must be set to auto-negation. > > I am kind of busy this week. I will try to add support for this chip into upstream next week. Is it possible to access the I2C bus? The GPIO lines from the SFP socket like LOS, TX Disable? Thanks Andrew