From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92162C3F2D7 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FA220732 for ; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="IEMPGc/a" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726209AbgCEOSZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:18:25 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:24255 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726129AbgCEOSZ (ORCPT ); Thu, 5 Mar 2020 09:18:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1583417903; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=CPLmPvg60dNkSrGFyR2iOQ9xr45oDSwNV1d+ed5BBwk=; b=IEMPGc/aXLzKsNd3Jw9YEKGl+0z89bDbDJ+yAcTdexBNI3dfzlYU75oJsJ5H0KMyBd78v3 1/edI6mlHItX31ekn1DVxaPycCeN9XPpk8xwb5Ejlrq6XzurH8YjrsN6EpBIjh5NvvEe68 m35Ku+BcOfqA+4ubcp7zgM57GgZfmHA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-23-OFZimnJ_M5WbkqOvcMCSPQ-1; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 09:18:22 -0500 X-MC-Unique: OFZimnJ_M5WbkqOvcMCSPQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB3BE19067E1; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krava (unknown [10.43.17.74]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBE9E28980; Thu, 5 Mar 2020 14:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2020 15:18:12 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Julia Kartseva Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , "labbott@redhat.com" , "acme@kernel.org" , "debian-kernel@lists.debian.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Andrey Ignatov , Yonghong Song , "jolsa@kernel.org" , Daniel Borkmann , "md@linux.it" , Cestmir Kalina Subject: Re: libbpf distro packaging Message-ID: <20200305141812.GH168640@krava> References: <20190828071237.GA31023@krava> <20190930111305.GE602@krava> <040A8497-C388-4B65-9562-6DB95D72BE0F@fb.com> <20191008073958.GA10009@krava> <20191016100145.GA15580@krava> <824912a1-048e-9e95-f6be-fd2b481a8cfc@fb.com> <20191220135811.GF17348@krava> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:22:35PM -0800, Julia Kartseva wrote: > > > On 12/20/19 5:58 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:37:23PM +0000, Julia Kartseva wrote: > >> Hi Jiri, > >> > >> 1. v. 0.0.6 is out [1], could you please package it? > >> 2. we might need a small spec update due to zlib is made an explicit > >> dependency in [2]. zlib should be listed in BuildRequires: section of the > >> spec so it's consistent with libbpf.pc > > > > sure, it's ok for rawhide, in fedora 31/30 we still don't have > > latest headers packaged > > > >> 3. Do you plan to address the bug report [3] for CentOS? Namely rebuilding > >> Fedora's RPM and publishing to EPEL repo? > > > > I did not get any answers on who would do that internally, > > so I'm afreaid I'll have to do it, but let me ask again first ;-) > > > > Bump :) > Jiri, any volunteers for Fedora EPEL 7|8 packaging? > systemd folks would appreciate it. > Thanks! hi, yep.. we've got Cestmir as 'volunteer' for that (cc-ed) ;-) I can see there's already epel8 branch for libbpf created.. but not sure what's the actual rpm status jirka