From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFB5C10F27 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2031B20674 for ; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:57:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="ZFRl5pGx" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727785AbgCJO5s (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:57:48 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.81]:20807 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726295AbgCJO5s (ORCPT ); Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:57:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1583852267; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=AbmGY4uz7W9+Z2kdlkADDdu9vVPFoM0fkBHCcTPirjk=; b=ZFRl5pGx+77fGLwr8CK01d4hqb6a4kRvIpt/MD757mglvgNesFDY6U/0zRL56jlr8S2Kj9 v+a77S+knZiYJtH6dMqC+Um/zgLvmjMGhmqL8CV/yRBntheduA9g764F0YsXjhGbudfKMX jGu4dTsSkkIa2GifhcsDvuGigIhw0oc= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-369-2Fjo-U2XN56No1qPbAI7eg-1; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 10:57:45 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 2Fjo-U2XN56No1qPbAI7eg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80CA0107ACC7; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from krava (ovpn-204-223.brq.redhat.com [10.40.204.223]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28A7F8F35E; Tue, 10 Mar 2020 14:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:57:17 +0100 From: Jiri Olsa To: Julia Kartseva Cc: Alexei Starovoitov , Andrii Nakryiko , "labbott@redhat.com" , "acme@kernel.org" , "debian-kernel@lists.debian.org" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , Andrey Ignatov , Yonghong Song , "jolsa@kernel.org" , Daniel Borkmann , "md@linux.it" , Cestmir Kalina Subject: Re: libbpf distro packaging Message-ID: <20200310145717.GB167617@krava> References: <20190828071237.GA31023@krava> <20190930111305.GE602@krava> <040A8497-C388-4B65-9562-6DB95D72BE0F@fb.com> <20191008073958.GA10009@krava> <20191016100145.GA15580@krava> <824912a1-048e-9e95-f6be-fd2b481a8cfc@fb.com> <20191220135811.GF17348@krava> <20200305141812.GH168640@krava> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200305141812.GH168640@krava> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.11 Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 03:18:12PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 04:22:35PM -0800, Julia Kartseva wrote: > > > > > > On 12/20/19 5:58 AM, Jiri Olsa wrote: > > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 09:37:23PM +0000, Julia Kartseva wrote: > > >> Hi Jiri, > > >> > > >> 1. v. 0.0.6 is out [1], could you please package it? > > >> 2. we might need a small spec update due to zlib is made an explicit > > >> dependency in [2]. zlib should be listed in BuildRequires: section of the > > >> spec so it's consistent with libbpf.pc > > > > > > sure, it's ok for rawhide, in fedora 31/30 we still don't have > > > latest headers packaged > > > > > >> 3. Do you plan to address the bug report [3] for CentOS? Namely rebuilding > > >> Fedora's RPM and publishing to EPEL repo? > > > > > > I did not get any answers on who would do that internally, > > > so I'm afreaid I'll have to do it, but let me ask again first ;-) > > > > > > > Bump :) > > Jiri, any volunteers for Fedora EPEL 7|8 packaging? > > systemd folks would appreciate it. > > Thanks! > > hi, > yep.. we've got Cestmir as 'volunteer' for that (cc-ed) ;-) I can see > there's already epel8 branch for libbpf created.. but not sure what's > the actual rpm status so I did some more checking and libbpf is automatically pulled into centos 8, it's just at the moment there's some bug preventing that.. it is going to be fixed shortly ;-) as for centos 7, what is the target user there? which version of libbpf would you need in there? jirka