From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65906C10F29 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36D7B20663 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="JjOwHDpi" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726626AbgCQMBK (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 08:01:10 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:38700 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725872AbgCQMBK (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 08:01:10 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=qxK0C9jTNnluhYNXzSgy9SFFooUP5xX2YpbUBq64+Ec=; b=JjOwHDpiPvfl/uKtY12YJiOmV Xht5bBMgG1XjYXKJRm2va9He0lHisj5cHPKBgVpun2++M9gIFDSKVt5skLEKgiqyFLh8nR8N0XPOw cj8rWjTzoyO6QCM39QMaBM/qJo4en83LkQqa1dINTXHKsMF3QlIK7b/yim2Lebl5mds8QnwCmoASo lXCGGx96yl5Ayiop0x6JMtIu0jsfxwC8LQ7adtCt2lLoUKmWIzpSo8w64nxowOogc3mS2XsVPcnBx kg63N0bwG99h3eiT6Oqco1E4zKoOTdAbXbL6hNHSVLdcVGKuHOGLgG93j5oyDG9DXHPocfth7TyoI 56orBgweA==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:54216) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jEAtt-0006sp-10; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:00:49 +0000 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jEAto-0002mc-9K; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:00:44 +0000 Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 12:00:44 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Florian Fainelli Cc: Vladimir Oltean , Andrew Lunn , Heiner Kallweit , Ido Schimmel , Vivien Didelot , "David S. Miller" , Ivan Vecera , Jakub Kicinski , Jiri Pirko , netdev Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/3] VLANs, DSA switches and multiple bridges Message-ID: <20200317120044.GH5827@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20200218114515.GL18808@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <15ce2fae-c2c8-4a36-c741-6fef58115604@gmail.com> <20200219231528.GS25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200221002110.GE25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> <20200316111524.GE5827@shell.armlinux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200316111524.GE5827@shell.armlinux.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 11:15:24AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 12:21:10AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 10:56:17AM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > Let's get your patch series merged. If you re-spin while addressing > > > Vivien's comment not to use the term "vtu", I think I would be fine with > > > the current approach of having to go after each driver and enabling them > > > where necessary. > > > > The question then becomes what to call it. "always_allow_vlans" or > > "always_allow_vlan_config" maybe? > > Please note that I still have this patch pending (i.o.w., the problem > with vlans remains unfixed) as I haven't received a reply to this, > although the first two patches have been merged. Okay, I think three and a half weeks is way beyond a reasonable time period to expect any kind of reply. Since no one seems to have any idea what to name this, but can only offer "we don't like the vtu" term, it's difficult to see what would actually be acceptable. So, I propose that we go with the existing naming. If you only know what you don't want, but not what you want, and aren't even willing to discuss it, it makes it very much impossible to progress. -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up