From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <SRS0=aWxS=5E=vger.kernel.org=netdev-owner@kernel.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on
	aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,
	HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99])
	by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44199C4332B
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:04:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67])
	by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DAC220732
	for <netdev@archiver.kernel.org>; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 13:04:39 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org;
	dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="AjKCdmNy"
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1727223AbgCSNEh (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@archiver.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 19 Mar 2020 09:04:37 -0400
Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:45000 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1726864AbgCSNEf (ORCPT <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 19 Mar 2020 09:04:35 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch;
        s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:
        Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:
        Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc
        :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:
        List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
        bh=ALEhqzUrdWOrOtrsu5TizOy7Y+cg2H0bWBjU7zo4CqA=; b=AjKCdmNyspJyHUcO6CU/0cJDlk
        69L+e1V6H+HHaWWjdftzXM/ba0jNXxpN4zh701dbzLsUmkjk+GhlSidH8gz2tQ5bDQwDEPpA/sXgC
        dZH/URHTh51VXi/DZ34sT+h6uqOGxUyH5sW2vOKufrVbIjNK60sggv2z3/cGgMoGvV8g=;
Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.93)
        (envelope-from <andrew@lunn.ch>)
        id 1jEuqb-0006YF-4A; Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:04:29 +0100
Date:   Thu, 19 Mar 2020 14:04:29 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc:     Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] net: phy: add and use phy_check_downshift
Message-ID: <20200319130429.GC24972@lunn.ch>
References: <6e4ea372-3d05-3446-2928-2c1e76a66faf@gmail.com>
 <d2822357-4c1e-a072-632e-a902b04eba7c@gmail.com>
 <20200318232159.GA25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
 <b0bc3ca0-0c1b-045e-cd00-37fc85c4eebf@gmail.com>
 <20200319112535.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200319112535.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org

> The only time that this helps is if PHY drivers implement reading a
> vendor register to report the actual link speed, and the PHY specific
> driver is used.

So maybe we either need to implement this reading of the vendor
register as a driver op, or we have a flag indicating the driver is
returning the real speed, not the negotiated speed?

	   Andrew