From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BCFC4332E for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFDC720714 for ; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 15:32:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="QuGeDcVU" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726832AbgCVPcb (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2020 11:32:31 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:50272 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725785AbgCVPcb (ORCPT ); Sun, 22 Mar 2020 11:32:31 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=GBWLiXIetq3iao8NDSJX3RHDoOSCZXvAQ79NXJI3pU4=; b=QuGeDcVUuQu0X4v6OZsefCf1dK tW1pNgnyYig8X+MjXohsFrtevqx9re+dNpQTw+xTlR7q6L5iMz4SqJ0BZS9ssV8LceXOob2qYFE/Y pXN4MXJ/0r2BnCh4PYHyaoPIXBOF3lCAnzLV6HH51+s5KcNrE/wXQmX7FNit14xEAMnM=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jG2aD-0000WM-7K; Sun, 22 Mar 2020 16:32:13 +0100 Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 16:32:13 +0100 From: Andrew Lunn To: Dejin Zheng Cc: f.fainelli@gmail.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, broonie@kernel.org, alexios.zavras@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 3/9] net: phy: introduce phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout macro Message-ID: <20200322153213.GL11481@lunn.ch> References: <20200322065555.17742-1-zhengdejin5@gmail.com> <20200322065555.17742-4-zhengdejin5@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200322065555.17742-4-zhengdejin5@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 22, 2020 at 02:55:49PM +0800, Dejin Zheng wrote: > it is sometimes necessary to poll a phy register by phy_read_mmd() > function until its value satisfies some condition. introduce > phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout() macros that do this. > > Suggested-by: Andrew Lunn > Signed-off-by: Dejin Zheng Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn Andrew