netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@gmail.com>
Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com,
	davem@davemloft.net, mchehab+samsung@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, broonie@kernel.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 08/10] net: phy: use phy_read_poll_timeout() to simplify the code
Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2020 19:18:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200322191832.GW25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200322174943.26332-9-zhengdejin5@gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 01:49:41AM +0800, Dejin Zheng wrote:
> use phy_read_poll_timeout() to replace the poll codes for
> simplify the code in phy_poll_reset() function.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dejin Zheng <zhengdejin5@gmail.com>
> ---
> v4 -> v5:
> 	- it can add msleep before call phy_read_poll_timeout()
> 	  to keep the code more similar. so add it.
> v3 -> v4:
> 	- drop it.
> v2 -> v3:
> 	- adapt to it after modifying the parameter order of the
> 	  newly added function
> v1 -> v2:
> 	- remove the handle of phy_read()'s return error.
> 
> 
>  drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 17 +++++------------
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> index a585faf8b844..24297ee7f626 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> @@ -1059,23 +1059,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(phy_disconnect);
>  static int phy_poll_reset(struct phy_device *phydev)
>  {
>  	/* Poll until the reset bit clears (50ms per retry == 0.6 sec) */
> -	unsigned int retries = 12;
> -	int ret;
> -
> -	do {
> -		msleep(50);
> -		ret = phy_read(phydev, MII_BMCR);
> -		if (ret < 0)
> -			return ret;
> -	} while (ret & BMCR_RESET && --retries);
> -	if (ret & BMCR_RESET)
> -		return -ETIMEDOUT;
> +	int ret, val;
>  
> +	msleep(50);
> +	ret = phy_read_poll_timeout(phydev, MII_BMCR, val, !(val & BMCR_RESET),
> +				    50000, 550000);
>  	/* Some chips (smsc911x) may still need up to another 1ms after the
>  	 * BMCR_RESET bit is cleared before they are usable.
>  	 */
>  	msleep(1);
> -	return 0;
> +	return ret;

This isn't actually equivaent behaviour.  If the read timed out, the old
code didn't wait 1ms.  Your new code does.  However, since we've waited
about 600ms already, it probably doesn't matter.

These sorts of things should be documented in the commit log, IMHO, so
it's obvious that it's been considered.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 10.2Mbps down 587kbps up

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-03-22 19:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-22 17:49 [PATCH net-next v5 00/10] introduce read_poll_timeout Dejin Zheng
2020-03-22 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v5 01/10] iopoll: introduce read_poll_timeout macro Dejin Zheng
2020-03-22 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v5 02/10] iopoll: redefined readx_poll_timeout macro to simplify the code Dejin Zheng
2020-03-22 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v5 03/10] net: phy: introduce phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout macro Dejin Zheng
2020-03-22 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v5 04/10] net: phy: bcm84881: use phy_read_mmd_poll_timeout() to simplify the code Dejin Zheng
2020-03-22 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v5 05/10] net: phy: aquantia: " Dejin Zheng
2020-03-22 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v5 06/10] net: phy: marvell10g: " Dejin Zheng
2020-03-22 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v5 07/10] net: phy: introduce phy_read_poll_timeout macro Dejin Zheng
2020-03-22 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v5 08/10] net: phy: use phy_read_poll_timeout() to simplify the code Dejin Zheng
2020-03-22 19:05   ` Andrew Lunn
2020-03-22 19:18   ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin [this message]
2020-03-22 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v5 09/10] net: phy: smsc: " Dejin Zheng
2020-03-22 17:49 ` [PATCH net-next v5 10/10] net: phy: tja11xx: " Dejin Zheng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200322191832.GW25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
    --cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab+samsung@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=zhengdejin5@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).