From: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
Ursula Braun <ubraun@linux.ibm.com>,
Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 net-next 03/11] s390/qeth: remove redundant if-clause in RX poll code
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 10:34:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200325093507.20831-4-jwi@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200325093507.20831-1-jwi@linux.ibm.com>
Whenever all completed RX buffers have been processed
(ie. rx->b_count == 0), we call down to the HW layer to scan for
additional buffers. If no further buffers are available, the code
breaks out of the while-loop.
So we never reach the 'process an RX buffer' step with rx->b_count == 0,
eliminate that check and one level of indentation.
Signed-off-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@linux.ibm.com>
---
drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c | 56 ++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
index 7c98bc9e2c9a..13facf2d602b 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_core_main.c
@@ -5536,6 +5536,10 @@ static unsigned int qeth_rx_poll(struct qeth_card *card, int budget)
unsigned int work_done = 0;
while (budget > 0) {
+ struct qeth_qdio_buffer *buffer;
+ unsigned int skbs_done = 0;
+ bool done = false;
+
/* Fetch completed RX buffers: */
if (!card->rx.b_count) {
card->rx.qdio_err = 0;
@@ -5549,36 +5553,28 @@ static unsigned int qeth_rx_poll(struct qeth_card *card, int budget)
}
/* Process one completed RX buffer: */
- if (card->rx.b_count) {
- struct qeth_qdio_buffer *buffer;
- unsigned int skbs_done = 0;
- bool done = false;
-
- buffer = &card->qdio.in_q->bufs[card->rx.b_index];
- if (!(card->rx.qdio_err &&
- qeth_check_qdio_errors(card, buffer->buffer,
- card->rx.qdio_err, "qinerr")))
- skbs_done = qeth_extract_skbs(card, budget,
- buffer, &done);
- else
- done = true;
-
- work_done += skbs_done;
- budget -= skbs_done;
-
- if (done) {
- QETH_CARD_STAT_INC(card, rx_bufs);
- qeth_put_buffer_pool_entry(card,
- buffer->pool_entry);
- qeth_queue_input_buffer(card, card->rx.b_index);
- card->rx.b_count--;
-
- /* Step forward to next buffer: */
- card->rx.b_index =
- QDIO_BUFNR(card->rx.b_index + 1);
- card->rx.buf_element = 0;
- card->rx.e_offset = 0;
- }
+ buffer = &card->qdio.in_q->bufs[card->rx.b_index];
+ if (!(card->rx.qdio_err &&
+ qeth_check_qdio_errors(card, buffer->buffer,
+ card->rx.qdio_err, "qinerr")))
+ skbs_done = qeth_extract_skbs(card, budget, buffer,
+ &done);
+ else
+ done = true;
+
+ work_done += skbs_done;
+ budget -= skbs_done;
+
+ if (done) {
+ QETH_CARD_STAT_INC(card, rx_bufs);
+ qeth_put_buffer_pool_entry(card, buffer->pool_entry);
+ qeth_queue_input_buffer(card, card->rx.b_index);
+ card->rx.b_count--;
+
+ /* Step forward to next buffer: */
+ card->rx.b_index = QDIO_BUFNR(card->rx.b_index + 1);
+ card->rx.buf_element = 0;
+ card->rx.e_offset = 0;
}
}
--
2.17.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-25 9:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-25 9:34 [PATCH v2 net-next 00/11] s390/qeth: updates 2020-03-25 Julian Wiedmann
2020-03-25 9:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 01/11] s390/qeth: simplify RX buffer tracking Julian Wiedmann
2020-03-25 9:34 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 02/11] s390/qeth: split out RX poll code Julian Wiedmann
2020-03-25 9:34 ` Julian Wiedmann [this message]
2020-03-25 9:35 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 04/11] s390/qdio: extend polling support to multiple queues Julian Wiedmann
2020-03-25 9:35 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 05/11] s390/qeth: simplify L3 dev_id logic Julian Wiedmann
2020-03-25 9:35 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 06/11] s390/qeth: clean up the mac_bits Julian Wiedmann
2020-03-25 9:35 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 07/11] s390/qeth: collect more TX statistics Julian Wiedmann
2020-03-25 9:35 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 08/11] s390/qeth: add TX IRQ coalescing support for IQD devices Julian Wiedmann
2020-03-25 9:35 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 09/11] s390/qeth: fine-tune MAC Address-related errnos Julian Wiedmann
2020-03-25 9:35 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 10/11] s390/qeth: keep track of fixed prio-queue configuration Julian Wiedmann
2020-03-25 9:35 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 11/11] s390/qeth: modernize two list helpers Julian Wiedmann
2020-03-25 19:07 ` [PATCH v2 net-next 00/11] s390/qeth: updates 2020-03-25 David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200325093507.20831-4-jwi@linux.ibm.com \
--to=jwi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ubraun@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).