From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C647C2D0F0 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 22:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EAB2077D for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 22:35:11 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com header.i=@google.com header.b="lNqO4gQE" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1733145AbgDAWfG (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 18:35:06 -0400 Received: from mail-ua1-f74.google.com ([209.85.222.74]:55045 "EHLO mail-ua1-f74.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732385AbgDAWfG (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 18:35:06 -0400 Received: by mail-ua1-f74.google.com with SMTP id v20so437361ual.21 for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 15:35:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:subject:from:to :cc; bh=9KR01r6gih4jhYYFHW4WFEV8YGH4JU+wPB7AaAwETRc=; b=lNqO4gQEsLC49pzkLSU8cnCQVc6iGeRg/6Wz0ziknQhxjWSurZeQBfYQlziEv+BmA5 eeOBjThcv4ld4rS6Q8KVb3RF8Suz8cSz6BsFatMUWiPPWf1yT0TEG1b83HHhncC5wqqx rnEkUvYYnHSEG9AKwfqswxBOXy+436Cpz8O34nI/jSRBSp3H1Ae1aqULuU2ANA4AI1vn 2BUubrAQ4f7W8hBFDf52veqo/LjbYA1DdGTTY2YhWZ+5qK4RKEe6ISrRXOdkwxU8se8v Txq8J87+3hHsgFggYKO0efyeOIHqFwT7P+Npg9I5l1QhPprBCK0qV0erj+QUayOlqOLE rpGg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :references:subject:from:to:cc; bh=9KR01r6gih4jhYYFHW4WFEV8YGH4JU+wPB7AaAwETRc=; b=sbzs4CTUbbWOqxag/8AA1EhxGzDTWkvopKB4ebw/UzX7bc/Io5rdAXCyC9dRzjekJm lMvi//r9V5NciZf29hokbhbzGFrhWIuZ0uqPGspHqGR72w8E5V7dTnRhBgjIVyGv1R4Q 3ssWty6r+1j5RIqY4AtR4NSTsCumFGaoeLdYbIEa+5taCVa4q9zpqTT1SXITGKJV7uS4 hIJmzRqCcyecOHJLMIKariWOTz6S8yza6PW9BEnycChle+g4Sm6hAtHziQndbb6VhnMH HqBC6kZFpsJrQ+8JvSinFTH9dy3Ol4f9VjVWvIb8AkVjY+8j/UCYKj+8PdQquu1lICpp oXHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuZWOINA91sryfkVtSanHlR33uM7+coOCY0rVAUAtVVuWZ4Y/JpE AyhToqvU91jebnlBi0ChF67vrsgqS1cVl7Wg1ZY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypIWtlrEX6Rjcp+suO+gRNYCoxIEp2c68OatrHaYVJczhIM61LZa5Bdjbebhzf0H9aK6vvFmnQPHyJtBYCNyfPY= X-Received: by 2002:ac5:cce8:: with SMTP id k8mr148063vkn.5.1585780503181; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 15:35:03 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 15:35:00 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20200401.113627.1377328159361906184.davem@davemloft.net> Message-Id: <20200401223500.224253-1-ndesaulniers@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 References: <20200401.113627.1377328159361906184.davem@davemloft.net> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0.rc2.310.g2932bb562d-goog Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 00/11] net: ethernet: ti: add networking support for k3 am65x/j721e soc From: Nick Desaulniers To: davem@davemloft.net Cc: arnd@arndb.de, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, grygorii.strashko@ti.com, kishon@ti.com, kuba@kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, m-karicheri2@ti.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, nsekhar@ti.com, olof@lixom.net, olteanv@gmail.com, peter.ujfalusi@ti.com, robh@kernel.org, rogerq@ti.com, t-kristo@ti.com, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org >> I think the ARM64 build is now also broken on Linus' master branch, >> after the net-next merge? I am not quite sure if the device tree >> patches were supposed to land in mainline the way they did. > >There's a fix in my net tree and it will go to Linus soon. > >There is no clear policy for dt change integration, and honestly >I try to deal with the situation on a case by case basis. Yep, mainline aarch64-linux-gnu- builds are totally hosed. DTC fails the build very early on: https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/311246218 https://travis-ci.com/github/ClangBuiltLinux/continuous-integration/jobs/311246270 There was no failure in -next, not sure how we skipped our canary in the coal mine.