From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4D7C38A2B for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E6720857 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 12:28:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ziepe.ca header.i=@ziepe.ca header.b="K9+oC8zp" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729016AbgDQM2b (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:28:31 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44652 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728071AbgDQM2a (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 08:28:30 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x742.google.com (mail-qk1-x742.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::742]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43EACC061A0C for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 05:28:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qk1-x742.google.com with SMTP id c63so2151584qke.2 for ; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 05:28:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ziepe.ca; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=aZefJ2eeeg5YJ8LbNLwmZ0QsC9kKV35KaDs/t6j0M1g=; b=K9+oC8zpTs7eoXwYoNCM97j0wAjePnqvg1MIHJIH7ous//tMV1Jr3cBr+kIJfIT6tw 3OcVpAAq67QKQZkGQMvO3bNsWwbJBnCUPX+HM2kSXjzzVPxyBC33diZFfVD7g36eaQ8V qfI7KDcfKd2QX+EUZ3jdUHgnHovu2cehHa1LIeWfd5uLrxhCooatkyANNHv7afAV7XJT obDDx3gIJGnGLvMi6zrE6ny3daHSgAl4TGZNNZtepoDTUoHKeOtld3APKqR8zMhi0jaR hYAiqzB2jOWifkzgQ5CnHvC62GPxGS/ig8I2V4XV7ODMhCnKVLz6AW73AfOwbKI5YsJ5 eQcw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=aZefJ2eeeg5YJ8LbNLwmZ0QsC9kKV35KaDs/t6j0M1g=; b=uOmWafu/FMVwHByB9PouYtUg/KdpLZQsdsc/6uEv38ptE+kIAGHeWPdqec1ktAIm/h EzQH8RXxZ4jss6VmHCe7TWKftp9T5L/Dal/R84AbGEkJM/QdpGZII0s7ZRkX7hMoST3L rY1dpl9YAfkvKwKfhkZN9W38idWXpJVgn46JAbYST9G8rydlEQiaPFYktbKZP4/6nSSi V3WH9pjKCbcD593yzoG+E7Y/RD8TRen/1v4QsL2xX9+z6SsbtXh8C+CTbQIY9Q77h3/g 1fWeFzrlPNxZO0qunyKqS8Zye3PXIngkXtf8go+tBprEvBFp6sDV6y2d0pzeWDKQ4zvY Z+8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuY3yRlxZG6rnQRHEOIBQNyN8RyPIN+6lOkbgmOFfVsNTTrssJ9G e6jxsHb8iigGEX/UHG8FE1Yn8Q== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ1vYJs1OcOpG6NFzpsPpo2EzISzAbbiESS6yc0Q6fShvvLk7GfaJtAZP1aoEPPARaV+dFckA== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:39b:: with SMTP id q27mr3018858qkm.94.1587126509481; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 05:28:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ziepe.ca (hlfxns017vw-142-68-57-212.dhcp-dynamic.fibreop.ns.bellaliant.net. [142.68.57.212]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id u17sm8223117qka.0.2020.04.17.05.28.27 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 17 Apr 2020 05:28:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jgg by mlx.ziepe.ca with local (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jPQ6d-0006gf-52; Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:28:27 -0300 Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 09:28:27 -0300 From: Jason Gunthorpe To: Jani Nikula Cc: Saeed Mahameed , Masahiro Yamada , linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann , Nicolas Pitre , narmstrong@baylibre.com, Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com, leon@kernel.org, kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com, jonas@kwiboo.se, airlied@linux.ie, jernej.skrabec@siol.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] Kconfig: Introduce "uses" keyword Message-ID: <20200417122827.GD5100@ziepe.ca> References: <20200417011146.83973-1-saeedm@mellanox.com> <87v9ly3a0w.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87v9ly3a0w.fsf@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 09:23:59AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > Which means that would have to split up to two. Not ideal, but > doable. Why is this not ideal? I think the one per line is easier to maintain (eg for merge conflicts) and easier to read than a giant && expression. I would not complicate things further by extending the boolean language.. Jason