From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: flow_offload: skip hw stats check for FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:52:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200420115210.GE6581@nanopsycho.orion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200420100341.6qehcgz66wq4ysax@salvia>
Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:03:41PM CEST, pablo@netfilter.org wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:13:02AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:05:05AM CEST, pablo@netfilter.org wrote:
>> >On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:02:00AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 01:53:38PM CEST, pablo@netfilter.org wrote:
>> >> >If the frontend requests no stats through FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED,
>> >> >drivers that are checking for the hw stats configuration bail out with
>> >> >EOPNOTSUPP.
>> >>
>> >> Wait, that was a point. Driver has to support stats disabling.
>> >
>> >Hm, some drivers used to accept FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED, now
>> >rulesets that used to work don't work anymore.
>>
>> How? This check is here since the introduction of hw stats types.
>
>Netfilter is setting the counter support to
>FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED in this example below:
>
> table netdev filter {
> chain ingress {
> type filter hook ingress device eth0 priority 0; flags offload;
>
> tcp dport 22 drop
> }
> }
Hmm. In TC the HW_STATS_DISABLED has to be explicitly asked by the user,
as the sw stats are always on. Your case is different.
However so far (before HW_STATS patchset), the offload just did the
stats and you ignored them in netfilter code, correct?
Perhaps we need another value of this, like "HW_STATS_MAY_DISABLED" for
such case. Because you don't care if the HW actually does the stats or
not. It is an optimization for you.
However for TC, when user specifies "HW_STATS_DISABLED", the driver
should not do stats.
>
>The user did not specify a counter in this case.
>
>I think __flow_action_hw_stats_check() cannot work with
>FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED.
>
>If check_allow_bit is false and FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED is
>specified, then this always evaluates true:
>
> if (!check_allow_bit &&
> action_entry->hw_stats != FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_ANY) {
>
>Similarly:
>
> } else if (check_allow_bit &&
> !(action_entry->hw_stats & BIT(allow_bit))) {
>
>evaluates true for FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED, assuming allow_bit is
>set, which I think it is the intention.
That is correct. __flow_action_hw_stats_check() helper is here for
simple drivers that support just one type of hw stats
(immediate/delayed).
>
>Another suggestion: This is control plane code and this
>__flow_action_hw_stats_check() function is relatively large, I'd suggest
>to move it to net/core/flow_offload.c at some point.
Sure, why not.
>
>Thank you!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-20 11:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-19 11:53 [PATCH net] net: flow_offload: skip hw stats check for FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-04-20 8:02 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20 9:05 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-04-20 9:13 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20 10:03 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-04-20 11:52 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2020-04-20 12:13 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-04-20 13:49 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20 12:28 ` Edward Cree
2020-04-20 12:36 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20 12:49 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-04-20 13:46 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20 12:39 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-04-20 13:48 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20 13:57 ` Florian Westphal
2020-04-20 14:14 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20 19:18 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-04-22 18:37 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-27 14:31 ` Edward Cree
2020-04-27 18:12 ` Jakub Kicinski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200420115210.GE6581@nanopsycho.orion \
--to=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).