netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Cc: netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: flow_offload: skip hw stats check for FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2020 13:52:10 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200420115210.GE6581@nanopsycho.orion> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200420100341.6qehcgz66wq4ysax@salvia>

Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:03:41PM CEST, pablo@netfilter.org wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:13:02AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:05:05AM CEST, pablo@netfilter.org wrote:
>> >On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 10:02:00AM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >> Sun, Apr 19, 2020 at 01:53:38PM CEST, pablo@netfilter.org wrote:
>> >> >If the frontend requests no stats through FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED,
>> >> >drivers that are checking for the hw stats configuration bail out with
>> >> >EOPNOTSUPP.
>> >>
>> >> Wait, that was a point. Driver has to support stats disabling.
>> >
>> >Hm, some drivers used to accept FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED, now
>> >rulesets that used to work don't work anymore.
>>
>> How? This check is here since the introduction of hw stats types.
>
>Netfilter is setting the counter support to
>FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED in this example below:
>
>  table netdev filter {
>        chain ingress {
>                type filter hook ingress device eth0 priority 0; flags offload;
>
>                tcp dport 22 drop
>        }
>  }

Hmm. In TC the HW_STATS_DISABLED has to be explicitly asked by the user,
as the sw stats are always on. Your case is different.
However so far (before HW_STATS patchset), the offload just did the
stats and you ignored them in netfilter code, correct?

Perhaps we need another value of this, like "HW_STATS_MAY_DISABLED" for
such case. Because you don't care if the HW actually does the stats or
not. It is an optimization for you.

However for TC, when user specifies "HW_STATS_DISABLED", the driver
should not do stats.


>
>The user did not specify a counter in this case.
>
>I think __flow_action_hw_stats_check() cannot work with
>FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED.
>
>If check_allow_bit is false and FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED is
>specified, then this always evaluates true:
>
>        if (!check_allow_bit &&
>            action_entry->hw_stats != FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_ANY) {
>
>Similarly:
>
>        } else if (check_allow_bit &&
>                   !(action_entry->hw_stats & BIT(allow_bit))) {
>
>evaluates true for FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED, assuming allow_bit is
>set, which I think it is the intention.

That is correct. __flow_action_hw_stats_check() helper is here for
simple drivers that support just one type of hw stats
(immediate/delayed).


>
>Another suggestion: This is control plane code and this
>__flow_action_hw_stats_check() function is relatively large, I'd suggest
>to move it to net/core/flow_offload.c at some point.

Sure, why not.


>
>Thank you!

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-20 11:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-19 11:53 [PATCH net] net: flow_offload: skip hw stats check for FLOW_ACTION_HW_STATS_DISABLED Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-04-20  8:02 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20  9:05   ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-04-20  9:13     ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20 10:03       ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-04-20 11:52         ` Jiri Pirko [this message]
2020-04-20 12:13           ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-04-20 13:49             ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20 12:28           ` Edward Cree
2020-04-20 12:36             ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20 12:49               ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-04-20 13:46                 ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20 12:39             ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-04-20 13:48               ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20 13:57                 ` Florian Westphal
2020-04-20 14:14                   ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20 19:18                     ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2020-04-22 18:37                       ` Jiri Pirko
2020-04-27 14:31                         ` Edward Cree
2020-04-27 18:12                           ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200420115210.GE6581@nanopsycho.orion \
    --to=jiri@resnulli.us \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).