Re: [PATCH V2 mlx5-next 01/10] net/core: Introduce master_xmit_slave_get

Jiri Pirko
2020-04-20T17:53:05Z

Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 07:43:14PM CEST, dsahern@gmail.com wrote:
>On 4/20/20 11:41 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>>
>>> I disagree. There are multiple master devices and no reason to have a
>>> LAG specific get_slave.
>>
>> Do you have usecase for any other non-lag master type device?
>> Note the ndo name can change whenever needed. I think the name should
>> reflect the usage.
>>
>
>right now, no. But nothing about the current need is LAG specific, so
>don't make it seem like it is LAG specific with the name.

I don't care really, I just thought we can make the connection by the
name. Makes sense to me.