Re: [PATCH V2 mlx5-next 01/10] net/core: Introduce master_xmit_slave_get

David Ahern
2020-04-20T17:43:18Z

On 4/20/20 11:41 AM, Jiri Pirko wrote:
>>
>> I disagree. There are multiple master devices and no reason to have a
>> LAG specific get_slave.
>
> Do you have usecase for any other non-lag master type device?
> Note the ndo name can change whenever needed. I think the name should
> reflect the usage.
>

right now, no. But nothing about the current need is LAG specific, so
don't make it seem like it is LAG specific with the name.