From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] net: phy: add concept of shared storage for PHYs
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 16:52:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200421145214.GD933345@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421144302.GD25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 03:43:02PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 04:34:55PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > +static inline bool phy_package_init_once(struct phy_device *phydev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct phy_package_shared *shared = phydev->shared;
> > > +
> > > + if (!shared)
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > + return !test_and_set_bit(PHY_SHARED_F_INIT_DONE, &shared->flags);
> > > +}
> >
> > I need to look at how you actually use this, but i wonder if this is
> > sufficient. Can two PHYs probe at the same time? Could we have one PHY
> > be busy setting up the global init, and the other thinks the global
> > setup is complete? Do we want a comment like: 'Returns true when the
> > global package initialization is either under way or complete'?
>
> IIRC, probe locking in the driver model is by per-driver locks, so
> any particular driver won't probe more than one device at a time.
Hi Russel
Cool, thanks for the info.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-21 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-20 23:26 [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] net: phy: add concept of shared storage for PHYs Michael Walle
2020-04-20 23:26 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/3] net: phy: bcm54140: use phy_package_shared Michael Walle
2020-04-20 23:26 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] net: phy: mscc: " Michael Walle
2020-04-23 12:27 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-04-21 14:34 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] net: phy: add concept of shared storage for PHYs Andrew Lunn
2020-04-21 14:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-04-21 14:52 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2020-04-21 15:20 ` Michael Walle
2020-04-21 15:25 ` Michael Walle
2020-04-21 15:50 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-04-21 19:08 ` Michael Walle
2020-04-21 19:30 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-04-21 19:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-04-21 21:19 ` Michael Walle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200421145214.GD933345@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).