From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] net: phy: add concept of shared storage for PHYs
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 17:50:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200421155031.GE933345@lunn.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7bcd7a65740a6f85637ef17ed6b6a1e3@walle.cc>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 05:25:19PM +0200, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2020-04-21 01:26, schrieb Michael Walle:
> > +
> > +/* Represents a shared structure between different phydev's in the same
> > + * package, for example a quad PHY. See phy_package_join() and
> > + * phy_package_leave().
> > + */
> > +struct phy_package_shared {
> > + int addr;
> > + refcount_t refcnt;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > +
> > + /* private data pointer */
> > + /* note that this pointer is shared between different phydevs and
> > + * the user has to take care of appropriate locking.
> > + */
> > + void *priv;
>
> btw. how should a driver actually use this? I mean, it can allocate
> memory if its still NULL but when will it be freed again. Do we need
> a callback? Is there something better than a callback?
Good point. phy_package_join() should take a size_t and do the
allocation. phy_package_leave() would then free it.
But since we don't have a user at the moment, maybe leave it out.
Andrew
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-21 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-20 23:26 [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] net: phy: add concept of shared storage for PHYs Michael Walle
2020-04-20 23:26 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 2/3] net: phy: bcm54140: use phy_package_shared Michael Walle
2020-04-20 23:26 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 3/3] net: phy: mscc: " Michael Walle
2020-04-23 12:27 ` Vladimir Oltean
2020-04-21 14:34 ` [RFC PATCH net-next 1/3] net: phy: add concept of shared storage for PHYs Andrew Lunn
2020-04-21 14:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-04-21 14:52 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-04-21 15:20 ` Michael Walle
2020-04-21 15:25 ` Michael Walle
2020-04-21 15:50 ` Andrew Lunn [this message]
2020-04-21 19:08 ` Michael Walle
2020-04-21 19:30 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-04-21 19:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-04-21 21:19 ` Michael Walle
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200421155031.GE933345@lunn.ch \
--to=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=michael@walle.cc \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vladimir.oltean@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).