From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B434C433DF for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 21:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 346F920727 for ; Thu, 14 May 2020 21:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="mkSo5KN+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728199AbgENVE7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2020 17:04:59 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:33086 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727122AbgENVE6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 May 2020 17:04:58 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=nIakemcvGrSlleeazZMw285DAqRzE/zcAS5fWft65g4=; b=mkSo5KN+yL3rncs/RXJLTFsuvx iA0px8NOntJ+lrSMHWRb1BH8gVSZeMPnqZJT8dCGnpRX42dsZHqrknRNOescpwGTDUdgOyZ7Ghp6y HDcXS8HHpXe8xMiW35FNlC3gzwZJ/enDY5GVxkOsmv1FgryjbJ5gmvNkePqTXn8rA1H0=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jZL2E-002KVz-RA; Thu, 14 May 2020 23:04:54 +0200 Date: Thu, 14 May 2020 23:04:54 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Dan Murphy Cc: f.fainelli@gmail.com, hkallweit1@gmail.com, davem@davemloft.net, robh@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] dt-bindings: net: dp83822: Add TI dp83822 phy Message-ID: <20200514210454.GB499265@lunn.ch> References: <20200514173055.15013-1-dmurphy@ti.com> <20200514173055.15013-2-dmurphy@ti.com> <20200514183912.GW499265@lunn.ch> <2f03f066-38d0-a7c7-956d-e14356ca53b3@ti.com> <20200514205028.GA499265@lunn.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org > Why would we need 2?  The SFP core would need to know that the LOS is > connected to the PHY. That is possible today. Just don't list the GPIO when declaring the SFP. > The PHY is strapped to configure the LED_1 as a GPIO input.  I am > not seeing a register that we can force this configuration. Ah, O.K. If it is selected via strapping only, they an additional property is not needed. Andrew